🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #34391

Re: Windows 95 stacks errors (MinSPs)

#34391
From: Barry Smith
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00
49 lines
2664 bytes
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, BinaryBillTheSailor@Sea++.com wrote:
>>Recently I have had the following Windows bluescreen error
>>several times.
>>
>>"There are no spare stack pages. It may be necessary to increase the
>>setting "MinSPs" in SYSTEM.INI to prevent possible stacks faults. There
>>are currently 5 SPs allocated."
>>
>>First time I got this message I rushed to SYSTEM.INI to increase the
>>value of MinSPs, but there was no reference to SPs, not of any kind. The
>>Windows 95 resource kit makes no reference to it either.
>>
>>So I took a chance, and inserted "MinSPs=6" under [386Enh]. It didn't
>>work. The original message was repeated. Can anyone help bale me out?
>
>Did you by some chance actually have those quote marks around the
>line? It should appear exactly like the example below:

No, of course not. I suppose had I quoted "[386Enh]", my meaning would
have been obvious.

>[386Enh]
>MinSPs=8

That is precisely what I tried. Except I set it to 6, as I didn't know
what overhead was involved in setting more. But if my system  seems to
use odd numbers, perhaps setting to 7 might help.

>Try that and let us know what happens. The fact that you are getting a
>messge that 5 are allocated is a little strange. Usually spare stack
>pages are allocated in even numbers. I've never seen 5 allocated
>before. Maybe you should search the entire System.ini file in case
>there is another duplicate entry somewhere further down in the file or
>something.

There is no other reference. I searched the entire file for "SP". The
closest I could find was:

        [386Enh]
        32BitSP=887

which looks unrelated, but about whose function I am also clueless.

I will try setting MinSPs=8, and give it a while to see if I get an
improvement. Thanks.

-- 
Barry Smith
Email: sax (at) wychcraft.demon.co.uk <--  I don't want ANY spam!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <OOnHoGAnZZF3Ew8m@wychcraft.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <$xXNEAA+IRF3EwYt@wychcraft.demon.co.uk> <3715295c.159127464@nntp.ix.netcom.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,8bf6921c89b0478b
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
X-Google-Thread: fde9e,8bf6921c89b0478b
X-Google-Attributes: gidfde9e,public
From: Barry Smith <Sax@wychcraft.demon.SPAMco.uk>
Subject: Re: Windows 95 stacks errors (MinSPs)
Date: 1999/04/15
Message-ID: <OOnHoGAnZZF3Ew8m@wychcraft.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 466631111
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: wychcraft.demon.co.uk:158.152.25.55
References: <$xXNEAA+IRF3EwYt@wychcraft.demon.co.uk> <3715295c.159127464@nntp.ix.netcom.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 924162635 nnrp-13:11645 NO-IDENT wychcraft.demon.co.uk:158.152.25.55
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: sax@wychcraft.demon.co.uk
Newsgroups: demon.tech.pc,alt.windows95