Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #34444Re: EPP, SPP and ECP
From: Roger J.Hamlett
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 00:00
52 lines
3465 bytes
3465 bytes
In article: <19990413.1703.4696snz@michaels.demon.co.uk>
4ms2u$ms@michaels.demon.co.uk (Michael Salem) writes:
>
> Roger J.Hamlett wrote useful information about types of parallel
port:
>
> It's worse than that! Some BIOSes give you the option of SPP
> (Standard Parallel Port), Bidirectional, EPP, ECP mode something
> (1.1?), ECP mode something else (1.3). And even SPP is capable of
> some degree of bidirectional operation (you can use it with input
> devices such as tape streamers).
Yes I was 'simplifying'. The SPP, allows input on the handshakeing
lines only. This gives 'nibble' wide input (as opposed to 'byte' wide
on the more sophisticated types), and correspondingly is a lot
slower for input transfers. The differences on the Bi-dir, versus EPP
modes is how the direction switching is controlled (the EPP mode
allows a signal line to reverse direction). The ECP modes affect how
the DMA is handled, and the latter modes require larger buffers.
> My advice is to start with the most capable mode (the last as you
> cycle through the options in the BIOS). If using Windows, make sure
> Windows has set the port in the same way as the BIOS. If it doesn't
> work, set it to SPP and see if it works. If so, try more advanced
> options.
Yes.
> Advantages of advanced types: are faster for some purposes (only if
> speed is limited by data transfer, rather then the peripheral
> itself). Often let peripherals report information to the computer
> ("printer out of ink").
>
> Disadvantages: if using an advanced port with a printer cable that
> doesn't have all 25 lines connected (many old cables; some new,
cheap
> cables), the printer may not work properly. Some peripherals have
> problems.
Very true.
It also often suprises people, how fast the parallel port in the more
sophisticated modes has got. A modern machine can transfer something
over 3MB/sec, over the parallel port, against USB, at only about
1MB/sec. The 'advantage' of USB, is the connection simplicity (cables
are easy, and you don't have all these 'modes' to worry about - at
least until 'USB2' arrives :-), and with the parallel port, it is
usual to have more problems when multiple devices are attached.
Best Wishes
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
| EMail roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk http://www.ttelmah.demon.co.uk/ |
| A beard! A beard! cried Fly Nicholas.'By God, that's a good one!'|
| (Chaucer) |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<61561364wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<T6K3qCAprjE3EwVf@dunvegan1.demon.co.uk> <923964853.16709.0.nnrp-13.d4e590c7@news.demon.co.uk> <+7esqLA4EyE3EwgJ@dunvegan1.demon.co.uk> <802583295wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk> <19990413.1703.4696snz@michaels.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,fd1689ae73a99e4e X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public X-Google-Thread: f54cc,48f5f44f91d1f7e6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf54cc,public From: Roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk (Roger J.Hamlett) Subject: Re: EPP, SPP and ECP Date: 1999/04/14 Message-ID: <61561364wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 466223923 References: <T6K3qCAprjE3EwVf@dunvegan1.demon.co.uk> <923964853.16709.0.nnrp-13.d4e590c7@news.demon.co.uk> <+7esqLA4EyE3EwgJ@dunvegan1.demon.co.uk> <802583295wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk> <19990413.1703.4696snz@michaels.demon.co.uk> X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!finch-post-10.mail.demon.net![158.152.142.84] X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 924080438 mail2news:18376 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk Organization: Myorganisation Reply-To: Roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk Newsgroups: demon.tech.pc