🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #34444

Re: EPP, SPP and ECP

#34444
From: Roger J.Hamlett
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 00:00
52 lines
3465 bytes
In article: <19990413.1703.4696snz@michaels.demon.co.uk>  
4ms2u$ms@michaels.demon.co.uk (Michael Salem) writes:
> 
> Roger J.Hamlett wrote useful information about types of parallel 
port:
> 
> It's worse than that! Some BIOSes give you the option of SPP 
> (Standard Parallel Port), Bidirectional, EPP, ECP mode something 
> (1.1?), ECP mode something else (1.3). And even SPP is capable of 
> some degree of bidirectional operation (you can use it with input 
> devices such as tape streamers).
Yes I was 'simplifying'. The SPP, allows input on the handshakeing 
lines only. This gives 'nibble' wide input (as opposed to 'byte' wide 
on the more sophisticated types), and correspondingly is a lot 
slower for input transfers. The differences on the Bi-dir, versus EPP 
modes is how the direction switching is controlled (the EPP mode 
allows a signal line to reverse direction). The ECP modes affect how 
the DMA is handled, and the latter modes require larger buffers.
 
> My advice is to start with the most capable mode (the last as you 
> cycle through the options in the BIOS). If using Windows, make sure 
> Windows has set the port in the same way as the BIOS. If it doesn't 
> work, set it to SPP and see if it works. If so, try more advanced 
> options. 
Yes.
 
> Advantages of advanced types: are faster for some purposes (only if 
> speed is limited by data transfer, rather then the peripheral 
> itself). Often let peripherals report information to the computer 
> ("printer out of ink").
> 
> Disadvantages: if using an advanced port with a printer cable that 
> doesn't have all 25 lines connected (many old cables; some new, 
cheap 
> cables), the printer may not work properly. Some peripherals have 
> problems.
Very true.
It also often suprises people, how fast the parallel port in the more 
sophisticated modes has got. A modern machine can transfer something 
over 3MB/sec, over the parallel port, against USB, at only about 
1MB/sec. The 'advantage' of USB, is the connection simplicity (cables 
are easy, and you don't have all these 'modes' to worry about - at 
least until 'USB2' arrives :-), and with the parallel port, it is 
usual to have more problems when multiple devices are attached.

Best Wishes

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
| EMail roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk  http://www.ttelmah.demon.co.uk/ |
| A beard! A beard! cried Fly Nicholas.'By God, that's a good one!'|
| (Chaucer)                                                        |
Technical Details
Message-ID: <61561364wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <T6K3qCAprjE3EwVf@dunvegan1.demon.co.uk> <923964853.16709.0.nnrp-13.d4e590c7@news.demon.co.uk> <+7esqLA4EyE3EwgJ@dunvegan1.demon.co.uk> <802583295wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk> <19990413.1703.4696snz@michaels.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,fd1689ae73a99e4e
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
X-Google-Thread: f54cc,48f5f44f91d1f7e6
X-Google-Attributes: gidf54cc,public
From: Roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk (Roger J.Hamlett)
Subject: Re: EPP, SPP and ECP
Date: 1999/04/14
Message-ID: <61561364wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 466223923
References: <T6K3qCAprjE3EwVf@dunvegan1.demon.co.uk> <923964853.16709.0.nnrp-13.d4e590c7@news.demon.co.uk> <+7esqLA4EyE3EwgJ@dunvegan1.demon.co.uk> <802583295wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk> <19990413.1703.4696snz@michaels.demon.co.uk>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Mail2News-Path: news.demon.net!finch-post-10.mail.demon.net![158.152.142.84]
X-Trace: mail2news.demon.co.uk 924080438 mail2news:18376 mail2news mail2news.demon.co.uk
Organization: Myorganisation
Reply-To: Roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk
Newsgroups: demon.tech.pc