Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #34558Re: FDISK
From: Harry Broomhall
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 00:00
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 00:00
20 lines
1547 bytes
1547 bytes
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999 14:14:49 +0100, Oz <Oz@upthorpe.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <370e5bb9.13913772@news.demon.co.uk>, Harry Broomhall
><haeb@pc60.demon.co.uk> writes
>>
>> IMHO *don't* use DOS6.2 on such a large drive. It doesn'r support
>>drives over 8Gb correctly. On drives under this limit the largest
>>partition you can create is 2Gb.
>
>A small side question. Presumably it would be OK if on an 18GB drive
>only the first 8GB (in 4 chunks) was dos62 and the rest 'another' OS?
If you are *fully* aware of what you are doing, and the 'another OS'
is not Windows based then yes - this will probably be OK.
I say 'probably' because I have come across motherboards with
BIOSes that get confused in such circumstances.
Regards,
Harry.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<370f8fcd.1640254@news.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<+CHhWCApZRD3EwLq@shacc.demon.co.uk> <370e5bb9.13913772@news.demon.co.uk> <Ne9WqQAJ1fD3EwtH@upthorpe.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,da6b0e82da45eede X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public From: haeb@pc60.demon.co.uk (Harry Broomhall) Subject: Re: FDISK Date: 1999/04/10 Message-ID: <370f8fcd.1640254@news.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 464631354 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pc60.demon.co.uk:158.152.8.1 References: <+CHhWCApZRD3EwLq@shacc.demon.co.uk> <370e5bb9.13913772@news.demon.co.uk> <Ne9WqQAJ1fD3EwtH@upthorpe.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 923703459 nnrp-06:28508 NO-IDENT pc60.demon.co.uk:158.152.8.1 Organization: C.I.C. Ltd MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: haeb@pc60.demon.co.uk Newsgroups: demon.tech.pc