Re: Disk Performance: ISA Cache vs EIDE on Motherboard

Article View: demon.tech.pc

Article #68659

#68659

From: Mike Yates
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:00

13 lines
1166 bytes

In article <830685352snz@cdsl.demon.co.uk>, Peter Hayward
<peter@cdsl.demon.co.uk> writes
>   I own an ISA caching disk controller fitted with 4MB of 30 pin simms
>   (well what use are 30 pin simms these days?) but I'm thinking of
>   getting a new motherboard and CPU that is likely to have it's own on
>   board (E)IDE controller.  The question is:-
Wish I could answer this. Had an ISA 2Mb cache in a PCI MB with onboard
IDE for several months until last week but projects changed and that server
never got "thrashed". Simple benchmarks showed the two options about
even. So, very interested, too!
-- 
Mike Yates         Frome   Somerset   England

Technical Details

Message-ID: <ksASkSAJ2RhxEwiZ@myates.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <830685352snz@cdsl.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,42f6e50e063305b8
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
From: Mike Yates <mike@myates.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Disk Performance: ISA Cache vs EIDE on Motherboard
Date: 1996/04/29
Message-ID: <ksASkSAJ2RhxEwiZ@myates.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 152105876
distribution: world
x-nntp-posting-host: myates.demon.co.uk
references: <830685352snz@cdsl.demon.co.uk>
organization: Just me!
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: demon.tech.pc

Reply to Parent Message