Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #68798Re: Evesham Vale PC's
From: Mike
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 00:00
20 lines
1355 bytes
1355 bytes
In article <317fe4b7.3583464@news.demon.co.uk>
prh@essence.demon.co.uk "Peter R. Humphrey" writes:
> Quoth Mike <zeus@myth.demon.co.uk> on Tue, 23 Apr 96 23:15:08 GMT:
>
> > BTW, it is 625 lines at 25Hz , or, more correctly 312.5 lines at 50Hz.
>
> That's only true for a static picture. If it's moving, the second sweep
> of the screen is updated in real time relative to the first sweep, i.e.
> in a different place on the screen. Therefore Richard's description is
> more accurate than yours, except for static images.
Eh? I don't think I grasp your point. No matter what, a PAL I 625 line signal
rasters a 312.5 line double interlace. Whether the imaging device choses to
use single frame (with interframe transfer) with interlaced readout or double
frame depends on the technology chosen surely?
Mike
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<830541139snz@myth.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<317fe4b7.3583464@news.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,4118116c6c8b3a53 X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public From: Mike <zeus@myth.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Evesham Vale PC's Date: 1996/04/26 Message-ID: <830541139snz@myth.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 151579310 x-nntp-posting-host: myth.demon.co.uk references: <317fe4b7.3583464@news.demon.co.uk> x-mail2news-path: myth.demon.co.uk organization: The Home for Deranged Hackerfolk reply-to: zeus@myth.demon.co.uk newsgroups: demon.tech.pc