Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #68845Re: Caught by cache?
From: J A F Bradbury
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:00
11 lines
1136 bytes
1136 bytes
John Naismith <John@naismith.demon.co.uk> writes: > Try 30-40% slower without cache - that would be nearer. > > And to the rest of you that participated in this thread - no I > *still* haven't re-opened the case :) > I'll get there eventually - honest... Terrible. Tell you what, let the new member help you ;) <Small hand grabs nicely coloured P5 cooling fan lead and ...> -- Julian AF Bradbury http://webzone1.co.uk/www/3b
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<287440270wnr@xabcs.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<415183800wnr@draycot.demon.co.uk> <y8Ry$BAgfhexEw5b@jasper.demon.co.uk> <830102878snz@phaedrus.demon.co.uk> <830132235.25952@pstancer.demon.co.uk> <317bc4ca.802017@news.demon.co.uk> <372392052wnr@naismith.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,7858595a79b6a65d X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public From: J A F Bradbury <Julian@xabcs.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Caught by cache? Date: 1996/04/24 Message-ID: <287440270wnr@xabcs.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 151357046 x-nntp-posting-host: xabcs.demon.co.uk references: <415183800wnr@draycot.demon.co.uk> <y8Ry$BAgfhexEw5b@jasper.demon.co.uk> <830102878snz@phaedrus.demon.co.uk> <830132235.25952@pstancer.demon.co.uk> <317bc4ca.802017@news.demon.co.uk> <372392052wnr@naismith.demon.co.uk> x-mail2news-path: xabcs.demon.co.uk organization: ErgonITe reply-to: Julian@xabcs.demon.co.uk newsgroups: demon.tech.pc