Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #68848Re: Backing up to DC-ROM? Help!
From: Roger Hamlett
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:00
55 lines
3454 bytes
3454 bytes
In article: <709668410wnr@xabcs.demon.co.uk> J A F Bradbury <Julian@xabcs.demon.co.uk> writes: > I wouldn't use it as principal backup medium. Use something like DAT > as the primary, then CD-R for archivable & distributable material. > > - DAT can run happily unattended & fast; HP-C1533A is a fast ~45MB. > > CD-R Probs? > o You need 650MB /contiguous/ disk space free :) This is not true, if you are generating HD backups, from a fast(ish) HD. > > o CD-Rs have a nasty habit of poor SCSI disconnect/connect, which when > doing concurrent TRs can make a very fast h/d, not quite so fast. > ( Try SCSI Bench, h/d alone, then with a CD/PD or CD-R ): > Putting a CD-R on it's own i/f solves this. > > o CD-Rs aren't as robust/long-lived as their pressed variety. > > o Writing them is tedious, a verify pass is a must. > Mistakes are tedious & the cost does mount. > > o Economically CD-R is a write-once miserly 650MB, with multi-session > carrying a ~50MB overhead. One 90m DAT tape: 4000MB rewritable @7ukp. > > For security, look at PD drives, or the "new" IBM 650MB M.O. drive, > or the new large and "interestingly priced" M.O. drives. > > The decision does come down to what data is going on the CD-R, how > often it is accessed or distributed. CD-R *IS* online, DAT isn't :( > The decision is likely to be greyish :) Basically this says it all. There are a couple of other thoughts though. I use CD-R, and DAT. The CD-R is ideal, for providing 'low-cost', backup for access as an 'archive' media, on a network. It is very cheap, to have a CD-stacker type drive, with a few CD's carrying data for reasonably rapid retrieval, without user intervention. It is also ideal, for storing development 'snap-shots', where the entire development enviroment, can be archived at a particular time, and returned to latter. It is not a substitute for a tape-backup system, I use the DAT for this, and also a Panasonic drive, writing WORM disks, for critical archive data. For a 'rapid recovery' disk, the PD drives are superb. I can have a complete copy of enough of my system, to re-boot & access the tape system, updated as necessary, and accessable from a floppy boot. The day, that the 10gB CD-R, that is writeable in 30minutes, and has a 1E6Hr MTBF on the drive, is launched, is the day that this takes off as a backup technology. However, used with care, it can be a useful 'extra' to other types of backuip. Best Wishes -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | EMail roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk | | A beard! A beard! cried Fly Nicholas. 'By God, that's a good one!'| | (Chaucer) |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<565531701wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<830255684snz@inf-eden.demon.co.uk> <830262961snz@lgab.demon.co.uk> <709668410wnr@xabcs.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,831bc7a4ee5c400d X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public From: Roger Hamlett <roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Backing up to DC-ROM? Help! Date: 1996/04/24 Message-ID: <565531701wnr@ttelmah.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 151440502 x-nntp-posting-host: ttelmah.demon.co.uk references: <830255684snz@inf-eden.demon.co.uk> <830262961snz@lgab.demon.co.uk> <709668410wnr@xabcs.demon.co.uk> x-broken-date: Wednesday, Apr 24, 1996 13.01.08 x-mail2news-path: relay-4.mail.demon.net!post.demon.co.uk!ttelmah.demon.co.uk organization: None reply-to: roger@ttelmah.demon.co.uk newsgroups: demon.tech.pc