Re: Evesham Vale PC's

Article View: demon.tech.pc

Article #68873

#68873

From: Mick Catley
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 00:00

12 lines
880 bytes

In article <830203673snz129.os2.7@corixia.demon.co.uk>, Richard Ashton
<richard@corixia.demon.co.uk> writes
>
>The extra speed of the 133 over the 120 is not worth the cost
>difference (IMHO)
>
Thought the big difference here was not so much the processor speed, but
the motherboard speed, ie 60MHz v 66MHz.
Regards
Mick Catley
MECatley@segsbury.demon.com.uk
GBBAWBP7@IBMMAIL.COM

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7kDiVCAIzIfxEwhz@segsbury.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <830014704.7521@stoob.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,4118116c6c8b3a53
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
From: Mick Catley <MECatley@segsbury.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Evesham Vale PC's
Date: 1996/04/23
Message-ID: <7kDiVCAIzIfxEwhz@segsbury.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 150939521
distribution: world
x-nntp-posting-host: segsbury.demon.co.uk
references: <830014704.7521@stoob.demon.co.uk>
organization: Once in a While
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: demon.tech.pc

Reply to Parent Message