Re: Caught by cache?

Article View: demon.tech.pc

Article #69056

#69056

From: J A F Bradbury
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 00:00

13 lines
1124 bytes

Kevin Poole <poole@draycot.demon.co.uk> writes:
> Both offered identical boards - UMC chipset, 1 VLB slot, a few PCI, 
> etc, 4X30 pin, 2x72 pin SIMM sockets, and, in the front right 
> corner, two square chips, soldered in (tiny pins all round the 
> edge), each marked "Write Back" and a load of numbers, none of which 
> looked like a size or speed indicator.

They are fake cache. I've seen 3 pentium m/bs with them, but
they also came with a COAST socket & 7ns PB module which is ok ;)

As long as there is a real-cache option, then it's ok.
-- 
Julian AF Bradbury            http://webzone1.co.uk/www/3b

Technical Details

Message-ID: <708079308wnr@xabcs.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <415183800wnr@draycot.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,7858595a79b6a65d
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
From: J A F Bradbury <Julian@xabcs.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Caught by cache?
Date: 1996/04/14
Message-ID: <708079308wnr@xabcs.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 147557721
x-nntp-posting-host: xabcs.demon.co.uk
references: <415183800wnr@draycot.demon.co.uk>
x-mail2news-path: xabcs.demon.co.uk
organization: ErgonITe
reply-to: Julian@xabcs.demon.co.uk
newsgroups: demon.tech.pc

Reply to Parent Message