🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #71521

Re: FATs different

#71521
From: Rajesh Varia
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 00:00
33 lines
1652 bytes
In article <718622267wnr@rococo.demon.co.uk>
           Roger@rococo.demon.co.uk "Roger Cook" writes:

> I recently ran Norton Utilities on a machine which indicated that the File
>  Allocation 
> Tables were different. It then proceeded to correct this problem (in the
>  process 
> creating two massive files in the root directory, which cannot be deleted by
>  normal 
> methods). What happens when the two FATs are different - does it affect 
> performance? , which FAT does the PC actually use ? The machine had apparently 
> been running slowly beforehand, but otherwise was functioning OK.
> 
Look like a program has created/deleted/changed a file incorrectly and
has messed one of the FATs up.  If no further problems occur then it looks
like a one off (run nortons frequently).

> Also what's the best method of getting rid of these files that DOS won't
>  recognise. I 
> seem to remember that there's a shareware utility called "elim" that deals with
>  such 
> stubborn files.
> -- 
> Roger Cook
> 
I think that the files could have the read-only flag set.  Try

attrib -r -a -s -h <filename>

then deleteing it.

-- 
Rajesh Varia     raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk
Technical Details
Message-ID: <817585794snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <718622267wnr@rococo.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,d515aecdb17ab885,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
From: Rajesh Varia <raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: FATs different
Date: 1995/11/28
Message-ID: <817585794snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 120321832
x-nntp-posting-host: c4rv.demon.co.uk
references: <718622267wnr@rococo.demon.co.uk>
organization: home
reply-to: raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk
newsgroups: demon.tech.pc