Article View: demon.tech.pc
Article #71521Re: FATs different
From: Rajesh Varia
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 00:00
33 lines
1652 bytes
1652 bytes
In article <718622267wnr@rococo.demon.co.uk>
Roger@rococo.demon.co.uk "Roger Cook" writes:
> I recently ran Norton Utilities on a machine which indicated that the File
> Allocation
> Tables were different. It then proceeded to correct this problem (in the
> process
> creating two massive files in the root directory, which cannot be deleted by
> normal
> methods). What happens when the two FATs are different - does it affect
> performance? , which FAT does the PC actually use ? The machine had apparently
> been running slowly beforehand, but otherwise was functioning OK.
>
Look like a program has created/deleted/changed a file incorrectly and
has messed one of the FATs up. If no further problems occur then it looks
like a one off (run nortons frequently).
> Also what's the best method of getting rid of these files that DOS won't
> recognise. I
> seem to remember that there's a shareware utility called "elim" that deals with
> such
> stubborn files.
> --
> Roger Cook
>
I think that the files could have the read-only flag set. Try
attrib -r -a -s -h <filename>
then deleteing it.
--
Rajesh Varia raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<817585794snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<718622267wnr@rococo.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,d515aecdb17ab885,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public From: Rajesh Varia <raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: FATs different Date: 1995/11/28 Message-ID: <817585794snz@c4rv.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 120321832 x-nntp-posting-host: c4rv.demon.co.uk references: <718622267wnr@rococo.demon.co.uk> organization: home reply-to: raj@c4rv.demon.co.uk newsgroups: demon.tech.pc