Re: Selecting Windows 3.1 or Windows 95 at boot-up.

Article View: demon.tech.pc

Article #71727

#71727

From: David Clark
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 00:00

19 lines
1220 bytes

In article <663488549wnr@sector.demon.co.uk>
           Peter@sector.demon.co.uk "C:WINSOCKKA9QSPOOLMAIL" writes:

|> Now I'd like to try Windows 95.
<snip>
|> .......  Am I likely to regret it if I try it out?

  You are likely to regret anything to do with windoze95!  ;)


-- 
Dave Clark

******************************************************************
*       To err is human.....                                     *
*                                                                *
*         .....to really foul things up requires a computer!     *
******************************************************************
Censorship is condoned by those people with something to hide......

Technical Details

Message-ID: <816219775snz@llamkuf.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <663488549wnr@sector.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,2f4330e17edf015c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public
From: David Clark <David@llamkuf.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Selecting Windows 3.1 or Windows 95 at boot-up.
Date: 1995/11/12
Message-ID: <816219775snz@llamkuf.demon.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 119294827
x-nntp-posting-host: llamkuf.demon.co.uk
references: <663488549wnr@sector.demon.co.uk>
organization: The Division Bell
reply-to: david@llamkuf.demon.co.uk
newsgroups: demon.tech.pc

Reply to Parent Message