🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <G2u3LA.283@dgsys.co.uk>, I wrote:

>Just to confirm: with the slrnpull from 0.9.6.2 all works perfectly for
>me.  Looking at your headers I can make a guess as to the version you're
>using, I'll see if I can find a copy and try that instead.

This reproduced your fault, which is actually with the article before
the one which looks like it gives the problem.

From changes.txt:

|Changes since 0.9.5.7
|[...]
|
|2.  slrn incorrectly interpreted an empty body as a server error.  I
|    think that most servers reject such messages but a few allow them.

I think this is the issue and hanging up on the basis of the content of
one article doesn't seem like a good idea.  Upgrading appears to be your
best solution.

Dan

-- 
Dan Glover (dan@dangl.demon.co.uk)