Article View: demon.tech.unix
Article #460Re: Stuffed ICMP masquerading
From: Nigel Cole
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:00
20 lines
1399 bytes
1399 bytes
In article <38C61439.52B9920D@oxsemi.com>, Paul Black <paul.black@oxsemi.com> writes >Nigel Cole <spamtin@zebekia.demon.co.uk> wrote: >> If I've read the output correctly, the REJECT was caused by output rule >> #3, and the rejected connection was an ICMP "Host unreachable" error. >> This rule is: >> >> # outgoing from local net on remote interface, stuffed masquerading >> ipchains -A output -i $extint -s $intnet -d 0.0.0.0/0 -l -j REJECT >> >> ($extint is ppp0, $intnet is 192.168.0.0/24) > >This rule rejects everything leaving your network. Surely "rejects everything *that isn't masqueraded* from being allowed out"? What I'd like to know is why it wasn't masqueraded. -- Dr. Nigel Cole Address 'spamtin' is valid, but 'nhcole' is read more often.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ImHNsjAYftx4EwjF@zebekia.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<xuWD+XAfrVx4EwkW@zebekia.demon.co.uk> <38C61439.52B9920D@oxsemi.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac57,e9cef78eb261a0c1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac57,public From: Nigel Cole <spamtin@zebekia.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Stuffed ICMP masquerading Date: 2000/03/08 Message-ID: <ImHNsjAYftx4EwjF@zebekia.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 594912396 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: zebekia.demon.co.uk:158.152.10.198 References: <xuWD+XAfrVx4EwkW@zebekia.demon.co.uk> <38C61439.52B9920D@oxsemi.com> X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 952556255 nnrp-13:20879 NO-IDENT zebekia.demon.co.uk:158.152.10.198 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: demon.tech.unix X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net