🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <40561bc7.10860276@news.dallas.sbcglobal.net>,
	123@abc.xyz (Simon Belmont) writes:
> Your debate hits rock bottom when I can cut and paste my own
> previous posts to respond to your new non-comprehending ones.
> 
> 
>>As to not bullying, what the hell is this:
>>
>>>I know, he's already derived some kind of no-life and perhaps
>>>pea-brained / immature pleasure from me writing this to begin
>>>with.... *[it's a fact, this is true for trolls, sorry if the truth hurts]*
> 
> I'm not bullying, for the sake of this group's effectiveness
> I suggested the following....and only you disagree with it:
> 
> "On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:09:08 GMT, 123@abc.xyz (Simon Belmont) wrote:
> Fine then, write up the "clueless" diners a comparo to read each
> time you start topics. The way it is now, your posts have no merit.

As I said several times before, I am not the person who started this
thread. I am someone who thinks you have a thing about control and
I'm complaining about your comments about the original author and his
original post. The point is that he posted about "eats" so shut the
fuck up!

> Then your asinine river 'o crap continues:
> 
>>This an "eats" newsgroup, please explain how the thread title is not
>>about "eats"? If you don't care for the thread then don't read it. No
>>need to show how big of an ass you can be by rudely posting again.
> 
> It's not about "eats" because every time you makes a new thread you
> never write anything to contribute to the "eats" portion.You're dense.

Again, I didn't start this thread. I just detest your comments to the
original author.

>>I'd say it's you that "derived some kind of no-life and perhaps
>>pea-brained / immature pleasure" from posting to this thread. Go
>>troll somewhere else.
> 
> No, actually, I am hoping that by pointing out how devoid of all merit
> your posts are, you may step up and make meaninful contributions.
> 
>>Just give up and admit you've been an ass and a troll on this thread
>>and go away.
> 
> The true ass is the one who runs and gets a new newsgroup account
> because he not much more than a chicken shit uber-idiot in a corner.
> If you feel what you say has merit, then post under your "usual" name.
> By not doing this you automatically reduce yourself to a no-good oaf.

Look who's talking! Your email address above is just as anonymous as
mine since yours is not valid. Just putting a name in the address
does not make it any more valid or less anonymous. When you use a real
address then come back. Until then you "automatically reduce yourself
to a no-good oaf" yourself.

> My ultimate victory in this is when you pay $15. for a month of a rip
> off NG service just to make a complete and total dunce of yourself.

I've been a customer of Newsguy for over 6 years, and they are far
from ripoffs. Until you pay for a news service rather than just using
the free access that comes with your ISP, go away. And get a real
news program, Agent sucks unless you are using it to download porn.
And get a cable modem or DSL, dialup is for jerkoffs.

Also notice that I only have a problem with you, yet you've slagged
several people over their "supposed" lack of netiquette, while you
constantly show your complete lack of it yourself.