🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <40587adb.769155@news.dallas.sbcglobal.net>,
	123@abc.xyz (Simon Belmont) writes:
> You continue to entertain me with you dunce-like antics.
> 
> 
> On 16 Mar 2004 20:03:46 GMT, Simon is an extremely huge ass wrote:
>>As I said several times before, I am not the person who started this
> 
> Until you you reveal your "usual" posting name, you will not be
> believed. And even then, that "usual" will more than likely be
> one of a handful of aliases you use to dilute newsgroup forums.

Sorry, but I don't a stalker, thank you.

>>I am someone who thinks you have a thing about control
> 
> I want to keep away nonsense garbage like yours, fine call me
> controlling. I do not appreciate the dilution your likes bring here.

Again, I am not the guy who started this thread. 

And I don't see the need for your netcop attitude, telling everyone
how wrong they are on what and how they post. It is absolutely none
of your business. IF you don't care for how someone posts, IGNORE
THEM!!!!!


>>Again, I didn't start this thread. I just detest your comments to the
>>original author.
> 
> You don't detest his mockery of this forum? You don't agree he should
> make contributions to the topics HE starts? You must be the same boy.

"Mockery of this forum"?  It's USENET newsgroups for Christsake. It's
a group about "eats", it's not some solemn "forum" called
dfw.nofastfoodhere. Now your attitude, that's something that deserves
mockery.


>>Look who's talking! Your email address above is just as anonymous as
>>mine since yours is not valid. Just putting a name in the address
>>does not make it any more valid or less anonymous. When you use a real
>>address then come back. Until then you "automatically reduce yourself
>>to a no-good oaf" yourself.
> 
> Your imbecilic thought process continues. You are damn right I have
> anonymous info here. Only a fool would use accurate info. As a victim
> of identity fraud I know better. One thing I can tell you is that I am
> consistent to used ONE alias, and you can look up my history if you
> wish. You have already demonstrated for all to see that you play
> hop-scotch with your aliases. THAT reduces you to a no-good oaf.

Oh please, killfiling by pattern is beyond your abilites? Give me a
break, you're enjoying this.

>>I've been a customer of Newsguy for over 6 years, and they are far
>>from ripoffs. Until you pay for a news service rather than just using
>>the free access that comes with your ISP, go away. And get a real
>>news program, Agent sucks unless you are using it to download porn.
>>And get a cable modem or DSL, dialup is for jerkoffs.
> 
> If you are telling the truth than why is your history only as long as
> this thread? Why don't you express your views with your "usual"
> alias? I fear you may have 100's but it doesn't hurt to ask. 6yrs?

You got it, 6 years. I'm avioding picking up a stalker, so I'm using
aliases since yo usem the type.

> Just because you have no life, don't assume I don't either. I only
> follow 2 that is TWO, newsgroups. No need for a separate NG
> service for my 1.2Mbps DSL connection. No need for any other
> newsgroup managing software. I reluctantly switched over from
> Outlook Express. I don't spend exhorbitant amounts of time on
> these forums unlike yourself. Porn? In my view you are paying a
> separate fee for an "anonymous" newsgroup service so you can
> download deviant files and wouldn't want to be tracked easily.

So you admit your obvious inexperience with USENET yet you still have
a netcop attitude. Go away little boy, this here is for grownups.

>>Also notice that I only have a problem with you, yet you've slagged
>>several people over their "supposed" lack of netiquette, while you
>>constantly show your complete lack of it yourself.
> 
> Provide examples of where I "slagged" others wrongly. You are a troll
> first and foremost, and have no room to say anything about this topic.

I would, but you'll just disagree that it was "wrongly" without
admitting you made a mistake. But look at the first post you made to
this group for a perfect example.

> Proved examples my "lack of netiquette" that I didn't acknowledge and
> apoligize for. You are spurting troll turds from your mouth. Amusing.

Telling people what is or what is not appropriate to post is a
perfect example of poor netiquette.

> Also, don't forget to respond to my other previous posting:

> 
> Please recall when I was new the this NG, I reluctantly took your
> postings seriously and tried to contribute to them. Then, after you
> repeated this nonsense of starting a thread and not contributing to
> it I realized  how foolish I was to EVER take you seriously. Well,
> when you are a newbie, you are a newbie. But I'm not anymore.

This is not my thread. And you just prove what a newbie you still are
by this rant. Only newbies worry about what people post and deride
them for doing such a "bad" job. Those that have been around know
just to ingore someone if you don't care for their posting style.
Hell, you even double post newbie!

> If you take your pills, I promise you will have less of these multi
> personality schizophrenic episodes. That is your ailment right?

Oh my, you've really slammed me now, whatever will I do?

> If you don't know it yet, SURPRISE. These NG's provide an
> outlet for you to vent it. Go see a doctor to find true reality....
> 
> Unfortuantely I don't think I can give you the proper "wake-up"
> call because your personality that trolls here will remain in denial.
> 
>        "ROTFLMAO  What happened to your plonk!?"

You're too much fun to poke at.