🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4058cf17.22333073@news.dallas.sbcglobal.net>,
	123@abc.xyz (Simon Belmont) writes:
> On 17 Mar 2004 02:02:33 GMT, Simon is an extremely huge ass wrote:
> 
>>Sorry, but I don't a stalker, thank you.
> 
> Don't flatter yourself.
> 
>>Again, I am not the guy who started this thread. 
> 
> Prove it.

You prove it isn't just you posting with a different name just to get
the chance to jump in and be a netcop.

>>And I don't see the need for your netcop attitude, telling everyone
>>how wrong they are on what and how they post. It is absolutely none
>>of your business. IF you don't care for how someone posts, IGNORE
>>THEM!!!!!
> 
> This fast food junkie has a history of doing nothing more than
> inciting flames. He knows what he is doing, and continues.
> There is nothing wrong with trying to keep this forum tidy.
> To me it is a resource. To you, obviously, it is a way of life.

So this group is so important to your life that it's critical that it
be run "your way". Again, grow up and just ignore him. Just ignore
me. Bet you can't.


>>"Mockery of this forum"?  It's USENET newsgroups for Christsake. It's
>>a group about "eats", it's not some solemn "forum" called
>>dfw.nofastfoodhere. Now your attitude, that's something that deserves
>>mockery.
> 
> I am not the only one who thinks the fast food junkie is intentionally
> diluting this resource, I'm just the one willing to stand up to it.

Oh my, he's "diluting this resource", it's a frigging news group. Go
to a moderated web chat if you're so worried about your "resource"
getting "diluted". What a froufrou.

>>Oh please, killfiling by pattern is beyond your abilites? Give me a
>>break, you're enjoying this.
> 
> I've repeatedly said I am enjoying observing buffoonery at its finest.

No, you just can't resist getting in the last word.

>>You got it, 6 years. I'm avioding picking up a stalker, so I'm using
>>aliases since yo usem the type.
> 
> Puh-Leez, don't flatter yourself. People have lives beyond stalking a
> mentally challenged, no-talent, no-life, silly newsgroup whores.

Then why are you answering every single post, even when I use a
different name, if you are not a stalker?

>>So you admit your obvious inexperience with USENET yet you still
>>have a netcop attitude. Go away little boy, this here is for grownups.
> 
> I will admit to anything that is true of me, unlike yourself. If you
> are an old man of the NG's shame on you, you are a pathetic
> example. You are one of those people who have illusions that
> their experience cannot be matched  in 1/1000th the time by
> a sharper and more clear-headed individual. You are slowww.
> So I am a little boy, and you will own up to being a grown man?
> You brought that one on yourself, think before you make posts.

Naw, you're just another newbie whose decided it's his job to clean
up this cesspool and teach those horrible people how to act. Grow up
and just let it slide. 

>>I would, but you'll just disagree that it was "wrongly" without
>>admitting you made a mistake.
> 
> I will always admit when I am wrong, and do so very openly.

That's what they all say...

>>But look at the first post you made to this group for a perfect example.
> 
> What is wrong with this post? A concise and coherent response that
> is years beyond anything you can offer this group. Check your head.

So:

"I know, he's already derived some kind of no-life and perhaps
pea-brained / immature pleasure from me writing this to begin
with..."

means you're a nice person who has only the best in mind for this
person? Go on, pull the other one...


>>>>I have been traveling to the Dallas/Arlington area for
>>>>a few years now and I am looking for really good CFS.
>>>
>>>Lucky's Cafe has the best one I've had around here, but then
>>>again just about everything on their menu is above average.
> 
> 
>>Telling people what is or what is not appropriate
>>to post is a perfect example of poor netiquette.
> 
> You are a hypocrite. Plain and simple. And a dunce too.

Oh my, now I'm a dunce. Your mastery of the language has me quaking
in fera.

>>This is not my thread. And you just prove what a newbie you still are
>>by this rant. Only newbies worry about what people post and deride
>>them for doing such a "bad" job. Those that have been around know
>>just to ingore someone if you don't care for their posting style.
>>Hell, you even double post newbie!
> 
> Again, nobody else will take the fast food junkie's bait. I
> intentionally bit, but for the purpose of the group's greater
> good. If you don't think my criticisms of his posts are big
> time justified then you are the same person, and only one.

Yes, it's obvious that you feel this is for the "group's" greater
good. But if that was so then 30, 40, or more people would join right
in with you. Let's see there's been ... 2 or 3.

>>Oh my, you've really slammed me now, whatever will I do?
> 
> It's not a slam. You have unresolved issues that have faltered
> your mental abilities (or maybe you were just born that way).
> 
> 
>>>        "ROTFLMAO  What happened to your plonk!?"
>>
>>You're too much fun to poke at.
> 
> The feeling is mutual. You cannot win this. Pack up and go home.

See, just got to have the last word.

> If you had a real argument to make, you would not cower behind
> a million and one aliases. That's proof that your responses = inane.

Again, your email name is no less anonymous than mine as no one can
contact you via it to verify who you might be. Until you use a real
address, you have no leg to stand on.