Article View: dfw.flame
Article #203Re: I have it out for Maxxcorp.
From: MaxxCorp, INC.
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:40
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:40
86 lines
4848 bytes
4848 bytes
Well I have discussed my SIG FILE with quite a few people who I value their opinions. These include people who are in ABUSE depts at Web Hosting companies & ISP's. They see NO PROBLEM with my SIG FILE. But I know you want to control everyone & make them follow you beliefs & values. GET OVER IT !!!!! On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:10:14 -0600, Bob Peterson <abusereporter0@mail.zgnews.com> wrote: >al <pabbi@swbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >>Bob Peterson wrote: >>> "Jason" <Jason24richardson@comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>He just sent a message to abuse@comcast.net to say that I was in violation >>>>of the dfw.forsale charter. >>> >>> >>> He's right. >>> >>> Your article promoting "Jason's Lawn Service" violates the >>> dfw.forsale charter clause that says, "Non commercial postings only." >>> A lawn service certainly seems to qualify as a commercial enterprise, >>> and you certainly posted an article promoting your company. >>> >>> And on April 1, 2003, you posted a message saying, "All I do is Mow >>> lawns. I hate it if I loose a customer because of something I can't >>> do." (See the message thread at >>> http://www.lawnsite.com/showthread.php?t=42272&page=2&pp=10). Sounds >>> an awful lot like a commercial enterprise, what with customers and >>> all. >>> >>> Then there's the entry on Texas Contractor Ratings' Web site >>> (http://www.texascontractorratings.com/contractors/Jason's-Lawn-Service). >>> Seems to be no doubt that "Jason's Lawn Service" is a commercial >>> operation. >>> >>> Now, what part of "Non commercial postings only" don't you >>> understand? >>> >>> >>>>Jason >>> >>> >>> Followups set. >>> >>> Bob >> >>Any comment about MaxxCorp's sig line, including links to an adult site, >>featuring nudity and intercourse? > >Mentioning one's business in a signature that conforms to the >generally accepted size limits (see the new Usenet user articles >routinely published in news.announce.newusers) is certainly OK. >Mark's .sig clearly exceeds the four line maximum suggested in the >various Netiquette articles, and was, for a time, a point of >discussion. IMNHO there is a difference between mentioning a business >as part of one's contact information and promoting a business. Mark >clearly promotes, while most others provide contact information. Mark >continues to be Mark. > >Mark's behavior, including the businesses he operates and promotes, >simply illuminate the type of person he is. > >>So, if Jason would just sell *something*, and tag a sig line offering >>lawn service, he'd be OK? > >"OK" is a matter of opinion. Mark can't very well complain about a >message whose body conforms to the newsgroup charter and that includes >a .sig mentioning the poster's business. > >Don't make the mistake of assuming no one is complaining just because >you see no complaints in the newsgroup. > >Bob ---------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.MaxxCorp.net - Custom Computer Solutions * SOHO Services http://www.FMCSA.org - A Non-Profit Group Dedicated to Safer Commerical Driving. http://www.DallasSaturdaySocials.com - Dallas Alternative Lifestyle Parties. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5g2ot0l7e0bksg8p7jai63o7oc6c2r3esr@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news-feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!ee54ec5b!not-for-mailReferences:
<Ns6dnQXOAJtnZkTcRVn-ow@comcast.com> <uo1kt0dr34941rl7u469d1qm48otj1pt0o@4ax.com> <YXICd.7122$F67.3836@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> <qpont0pl0gtqsq540go35dm9hbndohebtg@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 100f1a,e1c49cbe7b1bfcb6 X-Google-Attributes: gid100f1a,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news-feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!ee54ec5b!not-for-mail From: "MaxxCorp, INC." <SOHO@MaxxCorp.net> Newsgroups: dfw.flame Subject: Re: I have it out for Maxxcorp. Organization: MaxxCorp, INC. Reply-To: MaxxCorp@MaxxCorp.net Message-ID: <5g2ot0l7e0bksg8p7jai63o7oc6c2r3esr@4ax.com> References: <Ns6dnQXOAJtnZkTcRVn-ow@comcast.com> <uo1kt0dr34941rl7u469d1qm48otj1pt0o@4ax.com> <YXICd.7122$F67.3836@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> <qpont0pl0gtqsq540go35dm9hbndohebtg@4ax.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 86 NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.69.143.98 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1104939636 ST000 65.69.143.98 (Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:40:36 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:40:36 EST X-UserInfo1: OH_QBYWE\ZYUSRPXIJJ@NFXBWR\HPCTL@XT^OBPLAH[\RYIBK^RAQFW[ML\THRCKV^GGZKJMGV^^_JSCFFUA_QXFGVSCYRPILH]TRVKC^LSN@DX_HCAFX__@J\DAJBVMY\ZWZCZLPA^MVH_P@\\EOMW\YSXHG__IJQY_@M[A[[AXQ_XDSTAR]\PG]NVAQUVM Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:40:36 GMT