🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: dfw.flame
Article #203

Re: I have it out for Maxxcorp.

#203
From: MaxxCorp, INC.
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:40
86 lines
4848 bytes
Well I have discussed my SIG FILE with quite a few people who I value
their opinions. These include people who are in ABUSE depts at Web
Hosting companies & ISP's. They see NO PROBLEM with my SIG FILE. But I
know you want to control everyone & make them follow you beliefs &
values. GET OVER IT !!!!!

On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:10:14 -0600, Bob Peterson
<abusereporter0@mail.zgnews.com> wrote:

>al <pabbi@swbell.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Bob Peterson wrote:
>>> "Jason" <Jason24richardson@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>He just sent a message to abuse@comcast.net to say that I was in violation 
>>>>of the dfw.forsale charter.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   He's right.
>>> 
>>>   Your article promoting "Jason's Lawn Service" violates the
>>> dfw.forsale charter clause that says, "Non commercial postings only."
>>> A lawn service certainly seems to qualify as a commercial enterprise,
>>> and you certainly posted an article promoting your company.
>>> 
>>>   And on April 1, 2003, you posted a message saying, "All I do is Mow
>>> lawns. I hate it if I loose a customer because of something I can't
>>> do."  (See the message thread at
>>> http://www.lawnsite.com/showthread.php?t=42272&page=2&pp=10).  Sounds
>>> an awful lot like a commercial enterprise, what with customers and
>>> all.
>>> 
>>>   Then there's the entry on Texas Contractor Ratings' Web site
>>> (http://www.texascontractorratings.com/contractors/Jason's-Lawn-Service).
>>> Seems to be no doubt that "Jason's Lawn Service" is a commercial
>>> operation.
>>> 
>>>   Now, what part of "Non commercial postings only" don't you
>>> understand?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>Jason 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   Followups set.
>>> 
>>>     Bob
>>
>>Any comment about MaxxCorp's sig line, including links to an adult site, 
>>featuring nudity and intercourse?
>
>Mentioning one's business in a signature that conforms to the
>generally accepted size limits (see the new Usenet user articles
>routinely published in news.announce.newusers) is certainly OK.
>Mark's .sig clearly exceeds the four line maximum suggested in the
>various Netiquette articles, and was, for a time, a point of
>discussion.  IMNHO there is a difference between mentioning a business
>as part of one's contact information and promoting a business.  Mark
>clearly promotes, while most others provide contact information.  Mark
>continues to be Mark.
>
>Mark's behavior, including the businesses he operates and promotes,
>simply illuminate the type of person he is.
>
>>So, if Jason would just sell *something*, and tag a sig line offering 
>>lawn service, he'd be OK?
>
>"OK" is a matter of opinion.  Mark can't very well complain about a
>message whose body conforms to the newsgroup charter and that includes
>a .sig mentioning the poster's business.
>
>Don't make the mistake of assuming no one is complaining just because
>you see no complaints in the newsgroup.
>
>Bob

----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.MaxxCorp.net - Custom Computer Solutions * SOHO Services

http://www.FMCSA.org - A Non-Profit Group Dedicated to Safer Commerical Driving.

http://www.DallasSaturdaySocials.com - Dallas Alternative Lifestyle Parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5g2ot0l7e0bksg8p7jai63o7oc6c2r3esr@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news-feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!ee54ec5b!not-for-mail
References: <Ns6dnQXOAJtnZkTcRVn-ow@comcast.com> <uo1kt0dr34941rl7u469d1qm48otj1pt0o@4ax.com> <YXICd.7122$F67.3836@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> <qpont0pl0gtqsq540go35dm9hbndohebtg@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 100f1a,e1c49cbe7b1bfcb6
X-Google-Attributes: gid100f1a,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news-feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!ee54ec5b!not-for-mail
From: "MaxxCorp, INC." <SOHO@MaxxCorp.net>
Newsgroups: dfw.flame
Subject: Re: I have it out for Maxxcorp. 
Organization: MaxxCorp, INC.
Reply-To: MaxxCorp@MaxxCorp.net
Message-ID: <5g2ot0l7e0bksg8p7jai63o7oc6c2r3esr@4ax.com>
References: <Ns6dnQXOAJtnZkTcRVn-ow@comcast.com> <uo1kt0dr34941rl7u469d1qm48otj1pt0o@4ax.com> <YXICd.7122$F67.3836@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> <qpont0pl0gtqsq540go35dm9hbndohebtg@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 86
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.69.143.98
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1104939636 ST000 65.69.143.98 (Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:40:36 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:40:36 EST
X-UserInfo1: OH_QBYWE\ZYUSRPXIJJ@NFXBWR\HPCTL@XT^OBPLAH[\RYIBK^RAQFW[ML\THRCKV^GGZKJMGV^^_JSCFFUA_QXFGVSCYRPILH]TRVKC^LSN@DX_HCAFX__@J\DAJBVMY\ZWZCZLPA^MVH_P@\\EOMW\YSXHG__IJQY_@M[A[[AXQ_XDSTAR]\PG]NVAQUVM
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:40:36 GMT