🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:03:07 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:

>On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:46:00 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>
>>On 2007-07-05 18:48:39 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>>
>>> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:19:15 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 2007-07-05 07:08:32 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:58:30 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2007-07-04 23:16:34 -0400, Joeseph P. Blow <jpblow@gmail.com> said:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:54:47 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:54:33 -0400, Joeseph P. Blow <jpblow@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:39:19 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:48:20 GMT, Al Giazirra
>>>>>>>>>> <alwhoever@realitalianlastname.com > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:42:09 -0500, David Agnew
>>>>>>>>>>> <DavidAgnew@nospam.nul> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> How many of them outed an undercover CIA agent?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> You need to get this into perspective.  He didn't out anyone, he just
>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't tell the justice department who did even though the mother
>>>>>>>>>>> fucker knew damn well.  He was rewarded for his loyalty, something
>>>>>>>>>>> that the current sitting president is noted for.  The corrupt bastard!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> You fuckin morons crack me up! You are SO stupid, you are hilariously funny!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Free clue, morons... No one was "outed" No one was covert, therefore
>>>>>>>>>> no one could be "outed".
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Why do you feel the need for such a blatant lie to cover up for your
>>>>>>>>> god Bush, neocon?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Post the proof that I lied,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB112170178721288385-uh1ILw_RG4bAJGgqjdsNHxrYSNE_20050818.html?mod=blogs
>>
>>
>>Memo
>>
>>Underscored
>>Issue
>>
>>of 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Shielding
>>>>>>> Plame's Identity
>>>>>>> By ANNE MARIE SQUEO and JOHN D. MCKINNON
>>>>>>> Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
>>>>>>> July 19, 2005
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A classified State Department memo that may be pivotal to the CIA leak
>>>>>>> case made clear that information identifying an agent and her role in
>>>>>>> her husband's intelligence-gathering mission was sensitive and
>>>>>>> shouldn't be shared, according to a person familiar with the document.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But of course, you knew that.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> moron.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> IKWIABWAY noted.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> {yea, I know... Libtards are incapable of posting anything rational,
>>>>>>>> like "proof".}
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Proof posted, neotard.  Deny away.  You know you must.  It's all you
>>>>>>> can do.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> GAME. SET. MATCH.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> OK, we now know Bird Brain is beyond stupid, but slim... Where,
>>>>> exactly, in that post does it state she was covert? You do know that
>>>>> IS the standard that MUST be met, right?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Was it the "may be" statement?
>>>>> Was it the "information identifying an agent" statement?
>>>>> Was it the "her role" statement?
>>>>> Was it the "her husband's intelligence-gathering mission" statement?
>>>>> Was it the "shouldn't be shared" statement?
>>>>> Was it the "sensitive" statement?
>>>>> Which statement provided proof that she was "covert" and "protected
>>>>> info"?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Geez, you people are dumb!
>>>> 
>>>> Do you know what GUILTY means?
>>>> 
>>>> Scooter was tried in an open court (the kind you NeoCons hate) and
>>>> CONVICTED OF A FELONY.
>>>> 
>>>> Scooter should serve HARD TIME for his Un-American, traitorous acts!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> So you have not the foggiest clue why you posted that game shit...
>>> 
>>> OK, I knew that. Now you should, too.
>>
>>
>>I know that Bush has taken yet another huge chunk of credibility and flushed
>>it down the toilet. He has become an international laughingstock, besides being
>>an unfit commander in chief.
>
>Of course you do... You operate on "feelings", so you can know almost
>anything you "feel" would be right, irregardless of any pertinent
>facts.
>
>
>Mike Smith


Republicans don't deal in facts; only lies.