🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:29:59 -0500, David Agnew
<DavidAgnew@nospam.nul> wrote:

>On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:03:07 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:46:00 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 2007-07-05 18:48:39 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:19:15 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2007-07-05 07:08:32 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:58:30 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 2007-07-04 23:16:34 -0400, Joeseph P. Blow <jpblow@gmail.com> said:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:54:47 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:54:33 -0400, Joeseph P. Blow <jpblow@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:39:19 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:48:20 GMT, Al Giazirra
>>>>>>>>>>> <alwhoever@realitalianlastname.com > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:42:09 -0500, David Agnew
>>>>>>>>>>>> <DavidAgnew@nospam.nul> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How many of them outed an undercover CIA agent?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> You need to get this into perspective.  He didn't out anyone, he just
>>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't tell the justice department who did even though the mother
>>>>>>>>>>>> fucker knew damn well.  He was rewarded for his loyalty, something
>>>>>>>>>>>> that the current sitting president is noted for.  The corrupt bastard!
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> You fuckin morons crack me up! You are SO stupid, you are hilariously funny!
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Free clue, morons... No one was "outed" No one was covert, therefore
>>>>>>>>>>> no one could be "outed".
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Why do you feel the need for such a blatant lie to cover up for your
>>>>>>>>>> god Bush, neocon?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Post the proof that I lied,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB112170178721288385-uh1ILw_RG4bAJGgqjdsNHxrYSNE_20050818.html?mod=blogs
>>>
>>>
>>>Memo
>>>
>>>Underscored
>>>Issue
>>>
>>>of 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Shielding
>>>>>>>> Plame's Identity
>>>>>>>> By ANNE MARIE SQUEO and JOHN D. MCKINNON
>>>>>>>> Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
>>>>>>>> July 19, 2005
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> A classified State Department memo that may be pivotal to the CIA leak
>>>>>>>> case made clear that information identifying an agent and her role in
>>>>>>>> her husband's intelligence-gathering mission was sensitive and
>>>>>>>> shouldn't be shared, according to a person familiar with the document.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> But of course, you knew that.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> moron.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> IKWIABWAY noted.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> {yea, I know... Libtards are incapable of posting anything rational,
>>>>>>>>> like "proof".}
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Proof posted, neotard.  Deny away.  You know you must.  It's all you
>>>>>>>> can do.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> GAME. SET. MATCH.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> OK, we now know Bird Brain is beyond stupid, but slim... Where,
>>>>>> exactly, in that post does it state she was covert? You do know that
>>>>>> IS the standard that MUST be met, right?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Was it the "may be" statement?
>>>>>> Was it the "information identifying an agent" statement?
>>>>>> Was it the "her role" statement?
>>>>>> Was it the "her husband's intelligence-gathering mission" statement?
>>>>>> Was it the "shouldn't be shared" statement?
>>>>>> Was it the "sensitive" statement?
>>>>>> Which statement provided proof that she was "covert" and "protected
>>>>>> info"?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Geez, you people are dumb!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do you know what GUILTY means?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Scooter was tried in an open court (the kind you NeoCons hate) and
>>>>> CONVICTED OF A FELONY.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Scooter should serve HARD TIME for his Un-American, traitorous acts!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> So you have not the foggiest clue why you posted that game shit...
>>>> 
>>>> OK, I knew that. Now you should, too.
>>>
>>>
>>>I know that Bush has taken yet another huge chunk of credibility and flushed
>>>it down the toilet. He has become an international laughingstock, besides being
>>>an unfit commander in chief.
>>
>>Of course you do... You operate on "feelings", so you can know almost
>>anything you "feel" would be right, irregardless of any pertinent
>>facts.
>>
>>
>>Mike Smith
>
>
>Republicans don't deal in facts; only lies.

You are thinking that Baghdad Bob was republican?