🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:46:00 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:

>On 2007-07-05 18:48:39 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>
>> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:19:15 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2007-07-05 07:08:32 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:58:30 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2007-07-04 23:16:34 -0400, Joeseph P. Blow <jpblow@gmail.com> said:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:54:47 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:54:33 -0400, Joeseph P. Blow <jpblow@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:39:19 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:48:20 GMT, Al Giazirra
>>>>>>>>> <alwhoever@realitalianlastname.com > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:42:09 -0500, David Agnew
>>>>>>>>>> <DavidAgnew@nospam.nul> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> How many of them outed an undercover CIA agent?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> You need to get this into perspective.  He didn't out anyone, he just
>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't tell the justice department who did even though the mother
>>>>>>>>>> fucker knew damn well.  He was rewarded for his loyalty, something
>>>>>>>>>> that the current sitting president is noted for.  The corrupt bastard!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> You fuckin morons crack me up! You are SO stupid, you are hilariously funny!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Free clue, morons... No one was "outed" No one was covert, therefore
>>>>>>>>> no one could be "outed".
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Why do you feel the need for such a blatant lie to cover up for your
>>>>>>>> god Bush, neocon?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Post the proof that I lied,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB112170178721288385-uh1ILw_RG4bAJGgqjdsNHxrYSNE_20050818.html?mod=blogs
>
>
>Memo
>
>Underscored
>Issue
>
>of 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Shielding
>>>>>> Plame's Identity
>>>>>> By ANNE MARIE SQUEO and JOHN D. MCKINNON
>>>>>> Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
>>>>>> July 19, 2005
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A classified State Department memo that may be pivotal to the CIA leak
>>>>>> case made clear that information identifying an agent and her role in
>>>>>> her husband's intelligence-gathering mission was sensitive and
>>>>>> shouldn't be shared, according to a person familiar with the document.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But of course, you knew that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> moron.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> IKWIABWAY noted.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> {yea, I know... Libtards are incapable of posting anything rational,
>>>>>>> like "proof".}
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Proof posted, neotard.  Deny away.  You know you must.  It's all you
>>>>>> can do.
>>>>> 
>>>>> GAME. SET. MATCH.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> OK, we now know Bird Brain is beyond stupid, but slim... Where,
>>>> exactly, in that post does it state she was covert? You do know that
>>>> IS the standard that MUST be met, right?
>>>> 
>>>> Was it the "may be" statement?
>>>> Was it the "information identifying an agent" statement?
>>>> Was it the "her role" statement?
>>>> Was it the "her husband's intelligence-gathering mission" statement?
>>>> Was it the "shouldn't be shared" statement?
>>>> Was it the "sensitive" statement?
>>>> Which statement provided proof that she was "covert" and "protected
>>>> info"?
>>>> 
>>>> Geez, you people are dumb!
>>> 
>>> Do you know what GUILTY means?
>>> 
>>> Scooter was tried in an open court (the kind you NeoCons hate) and
>>> CONVICTED OF A FELONY.
>>> 
>>> Scooter should serve HARD TIME for his Un-American, traitorous acts!
>> 
>> 
>> So you have not the foggiest clue why you posted that game shit...
>> 
>> OK, I knew that. Now you should, too.
>
>
>I know that Bush has taken yet another huge chunk of credibility and flushed
>it down the toilet. He has become an international laughingstock, besides being
>an unfit commander in chief.

Of course you do... You operate on "feelings", so you can know almost
anything you "feel" would be right, irregardless of any pertinent
facts.


Mike Smith