🚀 go-pugleaf

On 2007-07-06 07:03:07 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:

> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:46:00 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2007-07-05 18:48:39 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>> 
>>> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:19:15 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 2007-07-05 07:08:32 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:58:30 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2007-07-04 23:16:34 -0400, Joeseph P. Blow <jpblow@gmail.com> said:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:54:47 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:54:33 -0400, Joeseph P. Blow <jpblow@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:39:19 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:48:20 GMT, Al Giazirra
>>>>>>>>>> <alwhoever@realitalianlastname.com > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:42:09 -0500, David Agnew
>>>>>>>>>>> <DavidAgnew@nospam.nul> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> How many of them outed an undercover CIA agent?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> You need to get this into perspective.  He didn't out anyone, he just
>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't tell the justice department who did even though the mother
>>>>>>>>>>> fucker knew damn well.  He was rewarded for his loyalty, something
>>>>>>>>>>> that the current sitting president is noted for.  The corrupt bastard!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> You fuckin morons crack me up! You are SO stupid, you are hilariously funny!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Free clue, morons... No one was "outed" No one was covert, therefore
>>>>>>>>>> no one could be "outed".
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Why do you feel the need for such a blatant lie to cover up for your
>>>>>>>>> god Bush, neocon?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Post the proof that I lied,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB112170178721288385-uh1ILw_RG4bAJGgqjdsNHxrYSNE_20050818.html?mod=blogs


Memo

Underscored
Issue

of

Shielding
Plame's 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Identity
>>>>>>> By ANNE MARIE SQUEO and JOHN D. MCKINNON
>>>>>>> Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
>>>>>>> July 19, 2005
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A classified State Department memo that may be pivotal to the CIA leak
>>>>>>> case made clear that information identifying an agent and her role in
>>>>>>> her husband's intelligence-gathering mission was sensitive and
>>>>>>> shouldn't be shared, according to a person familiar with the document.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But of course, you knew that.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> moron.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> IKWIABWAY noted.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> {yea, I know... Libtards are incapable of posting anything rational,
>>>>>>>> like "proof".}
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Proof posted, neotard.  Deny away.  You know you must.  It's all you
>>>>>>> can do.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> GAME. SET. MATCH.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> OK, we now know Bird Brain is beyond stupid, but slim... Where,
>>>>> exactly, in that post does it state she was covert? You do know that
>>>>> IS the standard that MUST be met, right?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Was it the "may be" statement?
>>>>> Was it the "information identifying an agent" statement?
>>>>> Was it the "her role" statement?
>>>>> Was it the "her husband's intelligence-gathering mission" statement?
>>>>> Was it the "shouldn't be shared" statement?
>>>>> Was it the "sensitive" statement?
>>>>> Which statement provided proof that she was "covert" and "protected
>>>>> info"?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Geez, you people are dumb!
>>>> 
>>>> Do you know what GUILTY means?
>>>> 
>>>> Scooter was tried in an open court (the kind you NeoCons hate) and
>>>> CONVICTED OF A FELONY.
>>>> 
>>>> Scooter should serve HARD TIME for his Un-American, traitorous acts!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> So you have not the foggiest clue why you posted that game shit...
>>> 
>>> OK, I knew that. Now you should, too.
>> 
>> 
>> I know that Bush has taken yet another huge chunk of credibility and flushed
>> it down the toilet. He has become an international laughingstock, besides being
>> an unfit commander in chief.
> 
> Of course you do... You operate on "feelings", so you can know almost
> anything you "feel" would be right, irregardless of any pertinent
> facts.

77% Of Americans have "feelings" like I do.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/29/opinion/polls/main2998882.shtml

NEW YORK, June 29, 2007


(CBS)�A CBS News poll shows Americans are increasingly dissatisfied 
with the Iraq war, President Bush and the Congress, as well as the 
overall direction of the country.

More Americans than ever before, 77 percent, say the war is going 
badly, up from 66 percent just two months ago. Nearly half, 47 percent, 
say it's going very badly.

While the springtime surge in U.S. troops to Iraq is now complete, more 
Americans than ever are calling for U.S. forces to withdraw. Sixty-six 
percent say the number of U.S. troops in Iraq should be decreased, 
including 40 percent who want all U.S. troops removed. That's a 7-point 
increase since April.

-- 
"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in 
England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after 
all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it 
is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a 
democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist 
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to 
the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL 
THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of 
patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY 
COUNTRY."
�
--Goering at the Nuremberg Trials