Article View: dfw.general
Article #10378Re: Marriage Penalty
From: Amy
Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 14:22
Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 14:22
62 lines
3255 bytes
3255 bytes
> Over the years under the democrat's raising of taxes and getting rid of > exemptions and no bracketing for inflation or deflation, the marriage > penalty that used to even is now uneven. Now there's a bit of revisionist history. It was Reagan and our very own Phil Graham that got rid of all of the exemptions and deductions in the 80s. The ever popular tax reform that lowered the top percentage rate but raised the bottom rate, removed all of the deductions that the middle class used like interest paid on credit cards to buy a car. -- Amy In the beginning was The Word, and The Word was Chocolate. And The Word became flesh, and dwelt upon us forever. ~ Confections 1oz:360cal "mapanari" <mapanari.cutthisout@austin.rr.com> wrote in message news:OaIH6.222035$wx.35270113@typhoon.austin.rr.com... > Yes, but the reason why we have the marriage penalty is because for so many > years the IRS screwed single people and the IRS laws were changed to reflect > that. > > Over the years under the democrat's raising of taxes and getting rid of > exemptions and no bracketing for inflation or deflation, the marriage > penalty that used to even is now uneven. > > What is *not* needed is another stupid tweak to an immense 500 pound gorilla > set of laws and exemptions; what is needed is a simple directive that says, > "If you make X amount of money, you pay X amount of taxes. And it doens't > matter if you're single, double, gay, ball less or had a masectomy, you pay > your fair share of taxes based upon how much you make. > > As it stands now under the democrat's ideas, they want to go back to the old > standard and even worse, of screwing the single people. > > Thirty years from now the single people will finally get relief from > congress for all the unfair tax breaks married people get, and then thirty > years after that the marrieds will be screaming about all the unfairness of > it all. And so it goes. > > > mapi > > "Henry" <Hgrover@aol.com> wrote in message news:3AEE1E86.6C2829B8@aol.com... > > Okay, > > Bush Cheney.....lets get rid of the illegal marriage penalty from the > > IRS. > > > > Henry > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<tf060hqdejqc65@corp.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3AEE1E86.6C2829B8@aol.com> <OaIH6.222035$wx.35270113@typhoon.austin.rr.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10b82c,df2dc017de314240 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b82c,public X-Google-Thread: 104ad1,df2dc017de314240 X-Google-Attributes: gid104ad1,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,df2dc017de314240 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-02 07:22:10 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Amy" <atoomim@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: dfw.general,austin.general,dc.general Subject: Re: Marriage Penalty Followup-To: dfw.politics,austin.politics Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 09:22:10 -0500 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <tf060hqdejqc65@corp.supernews.com> References: <3AEE1E86.6C2829B8@aol.com> <OaIH6.222035$wx.35270113@typhoon.austin.rr.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Lines: 64