🚀 go-pugleaf

"mapanari" <mapanari.nospamm@austin.rr.com> wrote in message
news:li3p6.21870$Fz.5377198@typhoon.austin.rr.com...
>   They're hired to be security, not the democratic morality police.

They were hired primarily to check IDs, according to Andy Frain, Jr., a job
at which they are apparently incompetent, as by all reports, there were many
minors present, including Jenna and puke boy.

>   I suppose you want the security to also pat down all the boys and girls
> for condoms, porno, ireligious literature and the like?

I suppose it's too much to ask that they do their jobs? If they were even
half assed doing their jobs, TABC and the cops would not have been there to
begin with.

>   When did you become a Republican, Dusty?

What does this have to do with a given political party?

>   Besides, this all sounds suspiciously like a Democratic dirty tricks
> campaign; they are trying to get back for all the years their sleeze-ball
in
> chief was justly harrassed and outed by the newsmedia and Republicans.

<giggle> You need to adjust yer gimme cap. The tin foil is showing.

So, your point is the Democrats forced Jenna and puke boy to throw an
illegal kegger, then arranged for TABC, a notoriously conservative bunch, to
raid the kegger, then arranged for the SS to bail out puke boy? I don't
suppose you could back up that rather bizarre analysis with any facts,
right?

>   Now, that's two posts tonight, Mr. Dusty.  Is that over my quota?
>   Make sure your little post counter is working; I wouldn't want you to
have
> to manually count all my posts and get it wrong.

These posts weren't content devoid. Just intelligence devoid.

Cheers,

Dusty

>
> mapi'
>
> "Dusty Rhodes" <terra@CANSPAMtexas.net> wrote in message
> news:ibTo6.1668$%o6.144557@bin1.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
> > "Barry Adair" <barry@adair.net> wrote in message
> > news:NFRo6.138128$bb.1451905@news1.rdc1.tx.home.com...
> >
> > > I left and returned at 12:30AM. still no
> > > problems, our guard was checking IDs which was the main job he was to
> do,
> > > about 1:00 AM, I spoke to William again, he did not seem to be
> > intoxicated,
> >
> > And yet both he and Jenna are well under age, as were many others at the
> > party, according to police. And he was *very* intoxicated, as were many
> > others at the party, again, according to police.
> >
> > So, your claim is no one was drunk at a frat kegger and there were no
> > underage folk, well, other than the guy who hired you and his
girlfriend.
> > What security firm is it that you work for? I'd hate to hire such
> > incompetent folk by accident.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dusty
> >
> >
>
>