🚀 go-pugleaf

"Professor Vonroach" <vonroach@popd.ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:39c7b3b7.15226607@NNTP.ix.netcom.com...
> On Sun, 03 Sep 2000 17:21:31 GMT, "The Pervert"
> <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Professor Vonroach" <vonroach@popd.ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> >news:39c53935.7300388@NNTP.ix.netcom.com...
> >> On Sun, 03 Sep 2000 07:33:42 GMT, "The Pervert"
> >> <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"Duffer" <ef.no.spam.duffer@home.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:CKls5.101080$oj6.2157862@news1.rdc1.tx.home.com...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Jafo" <jafo@_cheetah.net> wrote in message
> >> >> news:v3o0rsg0r2mqdkgg728dojf204v3dtee3f@4ax.com...
> >> >> > As viewed from alt.california, Duffer wrote:
> >> >> >
> >>
> >> >I don't care who he gets a blowjob from.  He could get it from you for
> >all I
> >> >care.  No crime in that.  It is, however, a crime to lie under oath.
> >It's
> >> >called perjury.  If he wants to lie to his wife, that's his business.
If
> >he
> >> >wants to lie to his friends, that's his business.  If he wants to lie
to
> >the
> >> >entitre country, that's my business as a citizen but not illegal and
my
> >> >recourse in through the voting booth. If he lies under oath, that's a
> >crime.
> >> >If he seeks to deny someone, say a Paula Jones for instance, her
entitled
> >> >day in court, that obstruction of justice, also a crime.
> >>
> >> Oddly enough, I do care who he gets it from and where. I don't want
> >> slimeball scum in the White House.
> >
> >Point taken, but for purposes of impeachment, it is not an issue.

> Wrong, the House of Representatives impeached him for perjury in the
> cover-up of his disgusting immoral behavior.  It was the Democrat
> Senators including Lieberman that decided to let the scumbag remain in
> the White House. Algore with his usual `precision' said that showed
> that he was the greatest of Presidents.

Not wrong.  He was impeached, and rightly so in my opinion, for the perjury.
What said perjury was related to is irrelevant.  Yes, many consider his
behavior unacceptable.  Yes, many consider him to be a scumbag.  That's fine
and dandy, but not impeachable.  Perjury and obstruction are the impeachment
issues.  There is no such thing as felony scumbag.

That Algore and Lieberman and the rest of the Democrats chose to be
completely partisan and ignore facts brought into evidence is another issue
to be judged by the eloctorate, as it should be.  Sadly, I think the
electorate is not ethical enough to hold them accountable.

> But never forget - Clinton was impeached, has been impeached, and will
> forever in the future be impeached. It cannot be washed away like
> censure. He now carries the title, the Second American President to be
> Impeached.

I don't forget that at all.  I agree that he should have been impeached.  I
further admire those Republicans who risked their careers for what they
believed, knowing that his aquittal in the Senate was a foregone conclusion.

I hope that Mr. Clinton suffers the humiliation of (properly) being
disbarred in Arkansas.  Then I'm looking forward to Hillary filing for
divorce immediately after she loses the Senate election so that they are
both shown to be opportunists.  I would like nothing more than for both of
them to fade into well-deserved oblivion.  Maybe Bill will start horsing
around with Barbra Streisand and Hillary will become 'close friends' with
Ellen now that Anne seems to have decided that she still likes men.

This soap opera is not yet over.