🚀 go-pugleaf

Anti.Fag@Anti.NAMBLA.org wrote:
|| Congratulations, Texas patriots and pervert obstructors, we
|| have thoroughly TORCHED, WHIPPED and DRAGGED the putrid
|| FAGGOT filth,
|| thus neatly quashing their quest for *legitimacy*.  Well 
done!
||
|| Oh, did anyone actually imagine that this crushing, vote
|| fulfilled conquest was about *marriage*?  Well, the odd queer
|| might have used
|| that *marriage angle* to reduce their -donations- to the
|| endlessly gluttonous, federal taxation, belching, shekel
|| vending machine, thereby increasing the (mostly single,
|| heterosexuals) alloted tax burden, but truthfully, the
|| ultimate queer plan was really to gain *judicially sanctioned
|| legitimacy*.
||
|| You see, doing this is a goal of theirs, that they have
|| termed, *keeping your eyes on the prize*, meaning that they
|| will have gained the ability to *demand* inclusion (similar
|| to the dragooned [so called] civil rights) and have their
|| degenerate, perverted lifestyle registered as a normal,
|| validated part of the acceptable societal framework, included
|| in textbooks, public school indoctrination and media outlets
|| of all types. Yes, that is their treasured *prize* and what
|| they really want.
||
|| Realistically, most FAGGOTS have no real desire to be
|| married, since that would not readily allow them to proceed
|| in having multiple sexual partners, or to achieve the level
|| of promiscuity that they are well known to savour.
||
|| One can only -imagine- the whimpering and wailing that
|| followed their total defeat in the state of Texas!  What
|| could be better?
||
|| LOL!

I find your attitude repugnent. Passage of Prop 2 had nothing
to do with denying rights to Homosexuals. It had to do with
the definition of marriage.

Cuz