🚀 go-pugleaf

"Cuz" <cuz@_cousins.org> wrote in news:O8Icf.15035$q%.826
@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com:

> Anti.Fag@Anti.NAMBLA.org wrote:
>
>|| Oh, did anyone actually imagine that this crushing, vote
>|| fulfilled conquest was about *marriage*?  Well, the odd queer
>|| might have used
>|| that *marriage angle* to reduce their -donations- to the
>|| endlessly gluttonous, federal taxation, belching, shekel
>|| vending machine, thereby increasing the (mostly single,
>|| heterosexuals) alloted tax burden, but truthfully, the
>|| ultimate queer plan was really to gain *judicially sanctioned
>|| legitimacy*.
>||
>|| You see, doing this is a goal of theirs, that they have
>|| termed, *keeping your eyes on the prize*, meaning that they
>|| will have gained the ability to *demand* inclusion (similar
>|| to the dragooned [so called] civil rights) and have their
>|| degenerate, perverted lifestyle registered as a normal,
>|| validated part of the acceptable societal framework, included
>|| in textbooks, public school indoctrination and media outlets
>|| of all types. Yes, that is their treasured *prize* and what
>|| they really want.
>||
>|| Realistically, most FAGGOTS have no real desire to be
>|| married, since that would not readily allow them to proceed
>|| in having multiple sexual partners, or to achieve the level
>|| of promiscuity that they are well known to savour.

[Important: Turn OFF your Word Wrap, NOW!]

Observe the important bits.  Read carefully and repetitively, until
you gain an adequate understanding, then print them out and share! ;-)

> I find your attitude repugnent.

As do most faggots, leftists, commies and PeeSea[tm] activists. ;-)

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=repugnant&x=0&y=0

Learn the words, before you use them improperly, Cuz <g>.

> Passage of Prop 2 had nothing to do with denying rights to Homosexuals.
> It had to do with the definition of marriage.

Read this entry carefully, too.

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=insight&x=0&y=0

You see, Cuz, you must understand the *real* motives, before you can make
an accurate assessment of any situation!

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=motives&x=0&y=0

End of enlightenment session; no charge. ;-)