🚀 go-pugleaf

Fred Hall wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:28:26 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet
> <cujo@insurgent.org> wrote:
> 
>>Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com> wrote in
>>news:e0afed$i2f$7@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>
>>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:33:52 -0500, SHERMLOCK SHOMES!
>>> <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:45:28 -0500, SHERMLOCK SHOMES!
>>>>> <kjh23412@alsdkfj3.tv> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>the real mh wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jack Zwick wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <Xns979351E3C373Fchico@216.196.97.136>,
>>>>>>>>  Weatherman@Global.Warming.is.a.Farce.net wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Those *scholarly* climate experts ( a.k.a. dedicated leftists,
>>>>>>>>> loonies and solidified kooks ;) just want to *believe* in GW so
>>>>>>>>> badly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's called {changing weather patterns}, kooks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Get over it and cool your "globally warmed" heels.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It's one thing to prove Global Warming, its quite something
>>>>>>>> different to demonstrate that its caused by human intervention.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Anyone who's studied the Geologic History of the Pleistocene
>>>>>>>> knows how great climate swings were (4 times even) long before
>>>>>>>> man's ancestors descended from trees.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "Warming" is a misnomer.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Global Climate Change is more accurate.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> And the *real* (not creation) science is clear -- the massive
>>>>>>> increase in C02 put into the atmosphere by our activity is having
>>>>>>> a direct impact on the climate. And the time scale of the recent
>>>>>>> changes seem to be much faster than previous "nature-induced"
>>>>>>> changes.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Whether anything can be done at this late hour to change the
>>>>>>> course we're on -- probably not.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But for the life of me, I can't understand why folks can't simply
>>>>>>> own up to the fact that yes, indeed, humans are having a direct
>>>>>>> impact on our environment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>because they are lazy-ass cheapskates who don't care about their own
>>>>>>(or anybody else's) health.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do you suppose the chemicals used to make your favorite black
>>>>> toenail polish contribute to the problem?
>>>>
>>>>black?  i never use black.  i'm not a fucking goth.
>>> 
>>> What color do you use?  Purple?
>>
>>You don't want to know it's not polish.
> 
> Oh, shit, you mean...

yes, it's...

"Darkest Berry"

DUNT DUNT DUNNNNN!

...at least in that photo on my okcupid profile.  funny you aren't mentioning
the skirt i'm wearing in the other picture.  didn't you like it? 

currently, i'm not wearing nail polish or a skirt, so i can imagine that you
don't find me "interesting" in my present state.

> 
>>
>>>>...and no.  nail polish doesn't *produce* CO2, you fucking assnard.
>>>>you really are this stupid, aren't you?
>>> 
>>> Typical fucktard Mop Jockey response.  Where did I write that nail
>>> polish produces CO2?
>>> 
>>> The toenail polish fumes have obviously damaged your brain.
>>
>>It's more like a death of a thousand cuts. Being born st00pit doesn't
>>help in the case of the Mop Jockey.
>>
>>Nice to see you've added another pet, need any extra leashes?
> 
> Nah, I've got some spares.  But I do appreciate you housebreaking
> Roberta for me.

pretending i'm not pissing all over you isn't gonna help you.

-- 
<insert pied piper song here>
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***