🚀 go-pugleaf

Joseph Crowe wrote:

> Who dragged this into all these newsgroups??
> 
> 
> 
> Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
> 
>>
>> Oh yeah...  Conclusions can be made on short term observations  which 
>> is exactly what is happening now.
>>
>> All the sheeple, (you included), are cowering at the abyss based on 
>> shrill proclamations by Al Gore and the like based on science that as 
>> time passes seems to have little to be based on not withstanding the 
>> huge amount of money generated in yet another created "feel good" 
>> industry.
>>
>> No one can deny that warming is taking place.  What all you blindly 
>> led herding critters don't want or are not capable recognizing is the 
>> increasing body of evidence that warming is solar based, cyclical and 
>> is affecting other planets as well. Human contributions to GW are but 
>> a mere drop in a large bucket.
> 
> 
>    It's probably closer to the truth to admit that in spite of all the
> money spent, scientists don't have any firm answers. By making
> assertions that Mann et al have, essentially their position is that
> they have all the answers and the warming trend is caused by one
> factor. To not even consider other variables makes no sense from a
> scientific PoV. The GCMs that people have poured money and data into
> have never been able to predict global temp changes accurately, which
> makes sense because the modeling a complex, chaotic system like the
> atmosphere is probably impossible. Ultimately, it seems that nobody
> on any side of this debate really has much in the way of answers, but
> that's not enough to keep many folks from advocating handing over even
> more of individuals' precious liberties to still more burgeoning
> bureaucracies at all levels.
> 


Wouldn'tcha know it...  Here's 'nuther interesting take on the GW 
hysteria by "some guy" at MIT..


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17997788/site/newsweek/


But, I suppose that this will be summarily dismissed by the GW zealots 
as lunacy...

JT