🚀 go-pugleaf

charliekilo wrote:

> "Bill Carter" <qhk6cxl02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message 
> news:OsGdnU5rQ524h4HbnZ2dnUVZ_oipnZ2d@giganews.com...
> 
>>charliekilo wrote:
>>
>>>"bob" <bob@indigo.com> wrote in message 
>>>news:461cb185.2365796@news.east.earthlink.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Grumpy AuContraire <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Nope, he don't...  I prefer to listen to the naysayers that are for the
>>>>>most part highly qualified independent thinkers such as:
>>>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17997788/site/newsweek/
>>>>>He is one of an increasing number of prominent scientists tossin' cold
>>>>>water on the GW hysteria...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Perhaps you would list some other "prominent scientists"?
>>>>The one you cited doesn't exactly have much credibility.
>>>>This clown makes money pandering to gullible fools:
>>>
>>>
>>>Yeah, MIT generally hires clowns as department heads... we can also 
>>>include Dr. William Grey another promiment scientist.
>>>
>>>Here are some other links for your reading enjoyment (includes comments 
>>>from prominent scientists):
>>>http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-climate5jan05,0,1965037.story?coll=la-home-headlines
>>>http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm
>>>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1363818.ece
>>>http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17997788/site/newsweek/
>>
>>It has come to my attention that people are posting links in this thread
>>to articles they didn't even read. I looked a couple of yours and I am
>>suspecting that might be the case here. If you have a position you want to
>>defend then come on out and say what it is. Cite your data. Make some
>>statements of fact.
> 
> 
> Personally, my position is skeptical. If it (man induced GW) were based on 
> science, it could be proven...by every scientist... in a mathematical proof. 
> Until then, I look at both sides and don't, in knee-jerk fashion, blame the 
> U.S..
> 
> 


You're wasting your breath.  These whiners simply are followers, not 
thinkers.

So far, the presented case simply lacks the proof required to quatify 
their, (The GW caused by humans scenario), case position.

As I have stated previously, I was sucked into bad science in the late 
1960's/early 1970's ---  Never Again.

JT