🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 00:24:12 -0500, "ChairMan" <why4@fu.com> wrote:

>In news:ehs663h1takqro82ecp1q7resshvsje2ta@4ax.com,
>Bat T Ball <ballbat@rangerscantwin.com>spewed forth:
>> On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:29:36 -0600, tom spillman
>> <nospam@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Bat T Ball wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:12:27 GMT, bl@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 22:29:50 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2007-06-01 19:52:47 -0400, John Mayson <john@mayson.us> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Trace wrote:
>>>>>>>> Houston-based KBR, formerly the engineering and construction
>>>>>>>> subsidiary of Halliburton Co., has a contingency contract in
>>>>>>>> place with the Department of Homeland Security to construct
>>>>>>>> detention facilities in the event of a national emergency.
>>>>>>> Stories are federal detention/concetration camps have been
>>>>>>> circulating at least since the early 90's (and probably sooner).
>>>>>>> Why should we believe this one any more than the dozens that
>>>>>>> have come before it?
>>>>>> Because some of the stories are REAL.
>>>>> It's hard to convince the brain dead middle class assholes who get
>>>>> their news from AM that anything that doesn't involve stuffing
>>>>> their faces, celebrity gossip, filling up their cars or paying the
>>>>> mortgage, exists.  Fuck them.
>>>>
>>>> And which one of you gave this awesome and unconstitutional power to
>>>> the Feds while jerking your knee after 9-11? Which one of you gave
>>>> the vote of confidence to the current legislature by reelecting
>>>> them? Is there anyone actually staying on the dark side and
>>>> considering the failure from NYC as a presidential candidate?
>>>> Damage done to our freedom was far worse than was done physically
>>>> after the criminal action by the terrorists.  How about actually
>>>> looking at the candidates this next election and thinking of the
>>>> republic as a whole and not your own hole as a republic.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You said:
>>>
>>> "Damage done to our
>>> freedom was far worse than was done physically after the criminal
>>> action by the terrorists."
>>>
>>> Perhaps you can enlighten me.  I, personally, have lost *NO*
>>> freedoms, nor do I know *anyone* who has.  I feel as free now, as I
>>> did before the current administration. After all, I have lived
>>> through the administrations of FDR, HST, Eisenhower, Kennedy, LBJ,
>>> Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush II.  Vague
>>> generalities will not be accepted, at least by me.  I lived through
>>> both WWII and the Korean War where I served.  I was deployed to a
>>> combat area longer than Senator Kerry and also earned a few minor
>>> decorations, so if you are talking about "rights" for our detainees,
>>> you will have to explain why we didn't give equivalent rights to the
>>> Germans, Japanese, Italians, North Koreans and Chinese captured in
>>> those wars.
>>>
>>> Likewise, what candidates would you suggest?  I have looked
>>>  carefully at ALL of the candidates in both major parties and I have
>>> found *none* that I would be willing to vote FOR.  I have found a
>>> number in both parties I would vote AGAINST.  The Democrats show
>>> little understanding of even Economics 101, much less larger issues
>>> of macroeconomics.  They actually seem to assume that price controls
>>> and excess profits taxes will *help*.  Apparently, they don't
>>> remember the Carter administration's results during the Arab boycott
>>> of the 1970's. Remember the gasoline shortages and long lines at the
>>> service stations?
>>>
>>> They also have not learned from the mistakes of the British and
>>> Canadians on health care and seem to want to bring those same
>>> problems of rationing of care and long waiting lists here.  If my
>>> wife and I were under either of their systems, we would both likely
>>> be dead now.  We both have been successfully treated for cancer
>>> starting in 1999 and 2000 and we're both still here.  With cancer,
>>> prompt treatment is essential.
>>>
>>> I have lived for an extended period in the UK while on business
>>> assignments and also was a manager on a new project in Toronto where
>>> my wife and I were exposed the the realities of the UK heath care
>>> and the Canadian system. Likewise, the Republicans, as a group, seem
>>> much too theocratic for my taste.
>>>
>>> I will await your enlightenment.  BTW, flaming will be ignored, and I
>>> will listen to reasoned discourse.  I will *plonk* flames or
>>> profanity.
>>>
>>> It is your choice.
>>>
>>> Regards...
>>>
>>> Tom
>>
>>
>> Then go ahead and plonk, nitwit.  You're either too blind or too
>> stupid to know what's going on.
>
>are you to stupid to enlighten us?
>here's your chance to show that you're smarter than a 5th grader and Rosie.
>defend your claim of our loss of freedoms.
>I'll even start the numbers for ya
>1.
>2.
>3.
>4.
>5.
>6.
>7.
>8.
>9.
>10.
>
>I figure that 10 is way more than you can come up with, so I'll quit there. 
>

What are you doing????

Liberal buffoons do not have to justify their anger and ignorance. 
All they have to do is "feel" that we have lost our rights for it to
be valid in their minds...

Geez... You are asking the buffoon to do something he is mentally
incapable of doing... 

Mike Smith