🚀 go-pugleaf

IDIOT!
"Mike Smith" <mws@wt.net> wrote in message 
news:k73863leicaihbrfp1g2pkb76u2ihbbrdb@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 00:24:12 -0500, "ChairMan" <why4@fu.com> wrote:
>
>>In news:ehs663h1takqro82ecp1q7resshvsje2ta@4ax.com,
>>Bat T Ball <ballbat@rangerscantwin.com>spewed forth:
>>> On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:29:36 -0600, tom spillman
>>> <nospam@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bat T Ball wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:12:27 GMT, bl@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 22:29:50 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2007-06-01 19:52:47 -0400, John Mayson <john@mayson.us> said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Trace wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Houston-based KBR, formerly the engineering and construction
>>>>>>>>> subsidiary of Halliburton Co., has a contingency contract in
>>>>>>>>> place with the Department of Homeland Security to construct
>>>>>>>>> detention facilities in the event of a national emergency.
>>>>>>>> Stories are federal detention/concetration camps have been
>>>>>>>> circulating at least since the early 90's (and probably sooner).
>>>>>>>> Why should we believe this one any more than the dozens that
>>>>>>>> have come before it?
>>>>>>> Because some of the stories are REAL.
>>>>>> It's hard to convince the brain dead middle class assholes who get
>>>>>> their news from AM that anything that doesn't involve stuffing
>>>>>> their faces, celebrity gossip, filling up their cars or paying the
>>>>>> mortgage, exists.  Fuck them.
>>>>>
>>>>> And which one of you gave this awesome and unconstitutional power to
>>>>> the Feds while jerking your knee after 9-11? Which one of you gave
>>>>> the vote of confidence to the current legislature by reelecting
>>>>> them? Is there anyone actually staying on the dark side and
>>>>> considering the failure from NYC as a presidential candidate?
>>>>> Damage done to our freedom was far worse than was done physically
>>>>> after the criminal action by the terrorists.  How about actually
>>>>> looking at the candidates this next election and thinking of the
>>>>> republic as a whole and not your own hole as a republic.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You said:
>>>>
>>>> "Damage done to our
>>>> freedom was far worse than was done physically after the criminal
>>>> action by the terrorists."
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you can enlighten me.  I, personally, have lost *NO*
>>>> freedoms, nor do I know *anyone* who has.  I feel as free now, as I
>>>> did before the current administration. After all, I have lived
>>>> through the administrations of FDR, HST, Eisenhower, Kennedy, LBJ,
>>>> Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush II.  Vague
>>>> generalities will not be accepted, at least by me.  I lived through
>>>> both WWII and the Korean War where I served.  I was deployed to a
>>>> combat area longer than Senator Kerry and also earned a few minor
>>>> decorations, so if you are talking about "rights" for our detainees,
>>>> you will have to explain why we didn't give equivalent rights to the
>>>> Germans, Japanese, Italians, North Koreans and Chinese captured in
>>>> those wars.
>>>>
>>>> Likewise, what candidates would you suggest?  I have looked
>>>>  carefully at ALL of the candidates in both major parties and I have
>>>> found *none* that I would be willing to vote FOR.  I have found a
>>>> number in both parties I would vote AGAINST.  The Democrats show
>>>> little understanding of even Economics 101, much less larger issues
>>>> of macroeconomics.  They actually seem to assume that price controls
>>>> and excess profits taxes will *help*.  Apparently, they don't
>>>> remember the Carter administration's results during the Arab boycott
>>>> of the 1970's. Remember the gasoline shortages and long lines at the
>>>> service stations?
>>>>
>>>> They also have not learned from the mistakes of the British and
>>>> Canadians on health care and seem to want to bring those same
>>>> problems of rationing of care and long waiting lists here.  If my
>>>> wife and I were under either of their systems, we would both likely
>>>> be dead now.  We both have been successfully treated for cancer
>>>> starting in 1999 and 2000 and we're both still here.  With cancer,
>>>> prompt treatment is essential.
>>>>
>>>> I have lived for an extended period in the UK while on business
>>>> assignments and also was a manager on a new project in Toronto where
>>>> my wife and I were exposed the the realities of the UK heath care
>>>> and the Canadian system. Likewise, the Republicans, as a group, seem
>>>> much too theocratic for my taste.
>>>>
>>>> I will await your enlightenment.  BTW, flaming will be ignored, and I
>>>> will listen to reasoned discourse.  I will *plonk* flames or
>>>> profanity.
>>>>
>>>> It is your choice.
>>>>
>>>> Regards...
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>
>>>
>>> Then go ahead and plonk, nitwit.  You're either too blind or too
>>> stupid to know what's going on.
>>
>>are you to stupid to enlighten us?
>>here's your chance to show that you're smarter than a 5th grader and 
>>Rosie.
>>defend your claim of our loss of freedoms.
>>I'll even start the numbers for ya
>>1.
>>2.
>>3.
>>4.
>>5.
>>6.
>>7.
>>8.
>>9.
>>10.
>>
>>I figure that 10 is way more than you can come up with, so I'll quit 
>>there.
>>
>
> What are you doing????
>
> Liberal buffoons do not have to justify their anger and ignorance.
> All they have to do is "feel" that we have lost our rights for it to
> be valid in their minds...
>
> Geez... You are asking the buffoon to do something he is mentally
> incapable of doing...
>
> Mike Smith