🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:35:33 -0500, Zeno <Zeno@home.kom> wrote:

>On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:51:07 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>
>>On 2007-06-29 20:35:38 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>>
>>> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:17:49 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 2007-06-28 07:40:36 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:11:33 GMT, CJT <abujlehc@prodigy.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Mike Smith wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:33:44 GMT, leroyblue@pillinor.net wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 01:27:42 -0500, David Agnew
>>>>>>>> <DavidAgnew@nospam.nul> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Posted on Tue, Jun. 26, 2007
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> GOP Senator Says Iraq Plan Not Working
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ANNE FLAHERTY The Associated Press
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The Senator is up for re-election and is playing politics. THE
>>>>>>>> ASSOCITED PRESS! You have got to be kidding. There isn't a more
>>>>>>>> anti-American propaganda machine in existence.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yes there is...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Reuters.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Mike Smith
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In other words, in the eyes of Republicans, the truth hurts.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Whatever feeds your fantasies, dude...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Study Claims Iraq's 'Excess' Death Toll Has Reached 655,000
>>>> By David Brown?Washington Post Staff Writer?Wednesday, October 11, 2006; A12
>>>> A team of American and Iraqi epidemiologists estimates that 655,000 
>>>> more people have died in Iraq
>>> 
>>> Awww poor dumb slim... once again playing in bullshit that's about 2
>>> feet taller than he is...
>>> 
>>> From:
>>> http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
>>> minimum dead civilians 	66,764
>>> Maximum dead civilians	73,07
>>
>>
>>From your own source:
>>
>>Summary
>>On every available indicator the year just ended (March 2006 � March 
>>2007) has been by far the worst year for violence against civilians in 
>>Iraq since the invasion:
>>
>>And yet, you continue to support a war against a country that was no 
>>threat to us.
>
>Is that really relevant to you making comments, seemingly daily, that
>support Bin Laden's efforts?  Are you a propaganda (hirabah) Jihadist?
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad
>
>Or, do you find that question not necessary to answer?  You are
>entitled to be a religious warrior?
>

I don't think he has the intelligence required to be a jihadist, he's
just one of their useful idiots. 

If you will notice, he rarely posts anything that HE actually created.
It's always a copy & paste from one of the left wing Anti-American
websites, such as move on, DU, soros's website, etc.

Mike Smith