🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:28:52 -0700, "LarryG@Yahuu.com"
<larryg_uu@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Jun 30, 6:52 am, Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 23:58:34 -0700, "Lar...@Yahuu.com"
>>
>> <larryg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >On Jun 29, 11:23 pm, Zeno <Z...@home.kom> wrote:
>> >> (2:20 in) Proponents of radical Islam (islamofasicsts) believe that
>> >> the west is engaged in a *conspiracy* to subjugate Islam.
>>
>> >>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6331994107023396223&q=obsess...
>>
>> >[Yawn]  Kind of lame for a conspiracy theory.  This is the same
>> >old fear mongering perpetuated by the real masters of public
>> >opinion manipulation.  Consider their other greatest hits:
>>
>> >- Saddaam has Weapons of Mass Destruction
>>
>> You meant "had" WMDs. Everyone and their dog knew that.
>
>No evidence (outside of administration propaganda) was ever
>presented to show WMD's existed.  Perhaps Santa and the Easter
>Bunny conspired with Saddaam to hide them in Never-Never Land.
>
>Yes, folks.  Mike Smith is really that gullible.

The Chairman knocked your dumbassed dick in the dirt on that one...

>
>
>
>> >- Anyone labelled as an "enemy combatant" is too dangerous to
>> >  have the rights of counsel, to know the charges against them,
>> >  to be tried in a court, to face their accuser, etc.
>>
>> By definition, they do not have access to our legal system. {Think
>> "Spies"}
>
>So much for everyone's civil rights, and the pressumption of
>innocence.  IIRC, trials of spies are publicly held in civilian
>criminal courts, not military tribunals.  Check your history.

So you are defending the al qaeda... Why am I NOT surprised...

>
>
>>
>> >- Osama bin Laden and nineteen poorly trained arab terrorists,
>> >  hijacked sophisticated commercial airlines, brought down the
>> >  Twin Towers, and punched a small hole in the Pentagon.
>>
>> It wasn't a small hole in the Pentagon, ya moron.
>
>It WAS smaller than the width of the fuselage of the airliner they
>*claimed* hit the Pentagon.  There were no impact marks or holes
>for the huge engines that should have impacted the outside wall.
>And there really wasn't sufficient debris to indicate that a large
>commercial jet was responsible for the damage.
>
>Get your facts straight before you embarass yourself further.
>
>Cheers,
>Larry G.

Larry, you are a moron. You have NOT the foggiest clue about what
happened at the Pentagon on 9-11-01.

Here are numerous eyewitness accounts:
 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html

And, even though you cannot possibly understand just how ignorant you
are, here's another debunking  of your mindless little rant:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=6

Mike Smith