🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jun 30, 3:22 pm, Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:28:52 -0700, "Lar...@Yahuu.com"

> >No evidence (outside of administration propaganda) was ever
> >presented to show WMD's existed.  Perhaps Santa and the Easter
> >Bunny conspired with Saddaam to hide them in Never-Never Land.
>
> >Yes, folks.  Mike Smith is really that gullible.
>
> The Chairman knocked your dumbassed dick in the dirt on that one...

Perhaps you missed Slim's response the negated what ChairMan wrote.




> >So much for everyone's civil rights, and the pressumption of
> >innocence.  IIRC, trials of spies are publicly held in civilian
> >criminal courts, not military tribunals.  Check your history.
>
> So you are defending the al qaeda... Why am I NOT surprised...

Perhaps you are familiar with the evidence that Al Qaeda is
a CIA asset.



> >It WAS smaller than the width of the fuselage of the airliner they
> >*claimed* hit the Pentagon.  There were no impact marks or holes
> >for the huge engines that should have impacted the outside wall.
> >And there really wasn't sufficient debris to indicate that a large
> >commercial jet was responsible for the damage.
>
> >Get your facts straight before you embarass yourself further.
>
> >Cheers,
> >Larry G.
>
> Larry, you are a moron. You have NOT the foggiest clue about what
> happened at the Pentagon on 9-11-01.
>
> Here are numerous eyewitness accounts:
>  http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html

Very shortly after the 911 "attack", the FBI rounded up (confiscated)
all of the cameras and video tape that might have recorded the
jet/missile as it approached the Pentagon.  If it truly were a
commercial airliner, as claimed, they could have released massive
amounts of photo and video evidence to support their assertion.
Since they are in possession of the "evidence" and have released
only a few undetailed frames, showing little of merit, a reasonable
person has to wonder what they are hiding from the public.




> And, even though you cannot possibly understand just how ignorant you
> are, here's another debunking  of your mindless little rant:http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?...

Here are a few links debunking the BS that PM put out:
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/100806popularmechanics.htm

>
> Mike Smith

Happy reading, fool!

Cheers,
Larry G.