🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:46:27 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:

>On 2007-06-30 07:55:10 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>
>> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:51:58 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2007-06-29 22:13:56 -0400, Zeno <Zeno@home.kom> said:
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:16:28 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2007-06-28 03:11:57 -0400, Zeno <Zeno@home.kom> said:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm sure if you stir enough of your muslim hate around, you'll be able
>>>>>> to defeat America in Iraq.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You cant blame the Muslims for hating us.
>>>> 
>>>> LOL, don't let Mike see you not blame those that are guilty.
>>>> 
>>>> With things like the Militant Mickey Mouse, you are thinking muslims
>>>> are somehow just in there hate spewing (aka this thread)?
>>>> 
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_suicide_bombers_in_the_Israeli-Palestinian_conflict#Indoctrinating_Children
>
>
>Britan
>
>and 
>>>> 
>>>>> America have been fucking them
>>>>> over for hundreds of years, and now they are fighting back.
>>>>> 
>>>>> God Bless America doesn't mean shit anymore.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> How about Bush & Co lying to the world to start a war just for profits sake?
>> 
>> 
>> And what lie would that be?
>> 
>> {Yes, I know slim has NO CLUE what a lie is, but let's see what he
>> "thinks" a lie is}
>> 
>> Post the lie, imbecile.
>
>There are so many of them....
>
>http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/03/07/22_lies.html
>
>Let start with these ten...
>
>Ten Appalling Lies We Were Told About Iraq
>By Christopher Scheer, AlterNet
>Posted on June 27, 2003, Printed on June 30, 2007
>http://www.alternet.org/story/16274/
>
>"The Iraqi dictator must not be permitted to threaten America and the 
>world with horrible poisons and diseases and gases and atomic weapons."
>-- George Bush, Oct. 7, 2002, in a speech in Cincinnati.

Just as I suspected, slim has absolute NO clue what a lie is...

>
>There is a small somber box that appears in the New York Times every 
>day. Titled simply "Killed in Iraq," it lists the names and military 
>affiliations of those who most recently died on tour of duty. 
>Wednesday's edition listed just one name: Orenthial J. Smith, age 21, 
>of Allendale, South Carolina.
>
>The young, late O.J. Smith was almost certainly named after the 
>legendary running back, Orenthal J. Simpson, before that dashing 
>American hero was charged for a double-murder. Now his namesake has 
>died in far-off Mesopotamia in a noble mission to, as our president put 
>it on March 19, "disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the 
>world from grave danger."
>
>Today, more than three months after Bush's stirring declaration of war 
>and nearly two months since he declared victory, no chemical, 
>biological or nuclear weapons have been found, nor any documentation of 
>their existence, nor any sign they were deployed in the field.
>
>The mainstream press, after an astonishing two years of cowardice, is 
>belatedly drawing attention to the unconscionable level of 
>administrative deception. They seem surprised to find that when it 
>comes to Iraq, the Bush administration isn't prone to the occasional 
>lie of expediency but, in fact, almost never told the truth.
>
>What follows are just the most outrageous and significant of the dozens 
>of outright lies uttered by Bush and his top officials over the past 
>year in what amounts to a systematic campaign to scare the bejeezus out 
>of everybody:

Damn, that was wordy...

>
>LIE #1: "The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear 
>weapons program ... Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength 
>aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which 
>are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons." -- President Bush, 
>Oct. 7, 2002, in Cincinnati.
>
>FACT: This story, leaked to and breathlessly reported by Judith Miller 
>in the New York Times, has turned out to be complete baloney. 
>Department of Energy officials, who monitor nuclear plants, say the 
>tubes could not be used for enriching uranium. One intelligence 
>analyst, who was part of the tubes investigation, angrily told The New 
>Republic: "You had senior American officials like Condoleezza Rice 
>saying the only use of this aluminum really is uranium centrifuges. She 
>said that on television. And that's just a lie."

Where's the lie. These tubes could have been used for enriching
uranium. Oh, I know... It's the anonymous Department of Energy
officials...

>
>LIE #2: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein 
>recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." -- 
>President Bush, Jan.28, 2003, in the State of the Union address.
>
>FACT: This whopper was based on a document that the White House already 
>knew to be a forgery thanks to the CIA. Sold to Italian intelligence by 
>some hustler, the document carried the signature of an official who had 
>been out of office for 10 years and referenced a constitution that was 
>no longer in effect. The ex-ambassador who the CIA sent to check out 
>the story is pissed: "They knew the Niger story was a flat-out lie," he 
>told the New Republic, anonymously. "They [the White House] were 
>unpersuasive about aluminum tubes and added this to make their case 
>more strongly."

Hey, dumbass... Just where did saddam get that 500 TONS of yellow
cake?
Damn, dude... You are gullible...

>
>LIE #3: "We believe [Saddam] has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear 
>weapons." -- Vice President Cheney on March 16, 2003 on "Meet the 
>Press."
>
>FACT: There was and is absolutely zero basis for this statement. CIA 
>reports up through 2002 showed no evidence of an Iraqi nuclear weapons 
>program.

Because we had limited CIA assets in Iraq, you fool. This info came
from other nation's intelligence. 

You really are gullible...

>
>LIE #4: "[The CIA possesses] solid reporting of senior-level contacts 
>between Iraq and al-Qaeda going back a decade." -- CIA Director George 
>Tenet in a written statement released Oct. 7, 2002 and echoed in that 
>evening's speech by President Bush.
>
>FACT: Intelligence agencies knew of tentative contacts between Saddam 
>and al-Qaeda in the early '90s, but found no proof of a continuing 
>relationship. In other words, by tweaking language, Tenet and Bush spun 
>the intelligence180 degrees to say exactly the opposite of what it 
>suggested.

You moron. Read what you posted. Your copy&paste bullshit
intentionally changed the parameters of what was stated.

senior-level contacts between Iraq and al-Qaeda going back a decade
versus
no proof of a continuing relationship.

Free clue buffoon... there can be senior level contacts without a
continuing relationship.

No lie there either.


Dude, you are a clueless blithering idiot. Accept that fact.
 Also accept the fact that you do not have the foggiest clue what a
lie is.

Mike Smith