🚀 go-pugleaf

In our last episode, <9efn83hbsbnhrd1o9vs5p5bj39mpenaq1h@4ax.com>, the
lovely and talented Mike Smith broadcast on austin.general:

> On 04 Jul 2007 15:05:40 GMT, Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com>
> wrote:

>>In our last episode, <bqcn83pnanij2hhdkqfsdeqhgn62ebrj5o@4ax.com>, the
>>lovely and talented Mike Smith broadcast on austin.general:
>>
>>> You probably believe saddam was no threat to us.
>>
>>Saddam was no threat to us.  US interests were safer while Saddam was in
>>power than today or with any government in Iraq that can possible arise from
>>Bush's war.


> Let's see... No threat...
> No quest for a nuclear capability...

No.

> No desire for chemical weapons...

No.

> No desire for biological weapons.. 

No.

> No desire to finance terrorists... 

Nothing to do with the US or anyone doing harm to the US.

> No desire to see us defeated...

Certainly not.  He needed a counterbalance against Iran.

> Yea... he was no threat to us... 

Yes, he was no threat to us.

> Why he would NEVER use any of those weapons on us... 

If he would, why didn't he use them to defend himself when the US
invaded?

> would he...
> Just because he would give/sell the weapons to every terrorist on this

Nothing of the sort ever happened.

> planet doesn't mean "HE" would use them against us, so he couldn't
> possibly be a threat to us...

> {Yes, liberals ARE this gullible}

> Mike Smith

Yes, Mike Smith is a liar.

-- 
Lars Eighner     <http://larseighner.com/>     <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
                         Countdown: 566 days to go.
   Friends of Lizbeth: help replace failed a/c at Austin's no-kill shelter
          <https://secure.groundspring.org/dn/index.php?aid=12349>