🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:24:28 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:

>On 04 Jul 2007 15:46:22 GMT, Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In our last episode, <9efn83hbsbnhrd1o9vs5p5bj39mpenaq1h@4ax.com>, the
>>lovely and talented Mike Smith broadcast on austin.general:
>>
>>> On 04 Jul 2007 15:05:40 GMT, Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>In our last episode, <bqcn83pnanij2hhdkqfsdeqhgn62ebrj5o@4ax.com>, the
>>>>lovely and talented Mike Smith broadcast on austin.general:
>>>>
>>>>> You probably believe saddam was no threat to us.
>>>>
>>>>Saddam was no threat to us.  US interests were safer while Saddam was in
>>>>power than today or with any government in Iraq that can possible arise from
>>>>Bush's war.
>>
>>
>>> Let's see... No threat...
>>> No quest for a nuclear capability...
>>
>>No.
>>
>>> No desire for chemical weapons...
>>
>>No.
>>
>>> No desire for biological weapons.. 
>>
>>No.
>>
>>> No desire to finance terrorists... 
>>
>>Nothing to do with the US or anyone doing harm to the US.
>>
>>> No desire to see us defeated...
>>
>>Certainly not.  He needed a counterbalance against Iran.
>>
>>> Yea... he was no threat to us... 
>>
>>Yes, he was no threat to us.
>>
>>> Why he would NEVER use any of those weapons on us... 
>>
>>If he would, why didn't he use them to defend himself when the US
>>invaded?
>>
>>> would he...
>>> Just because he would give/sell the weapons to every terrorist on this
>>
>>Nothing of the sort ever happened.
>>
>>> planet doesn't mean "HE" would use them against us, so he couldn't
>>> possibly be a threat to us...
>>
>>> {Yes, liberals ARE this gullible}
>>
>>> Mike Smith
>>
>>Yes, Mike Smith is a liar.
>
>
>See what I mean, folks? 
>Unbelievably gullible...
>
>Mike Smith

Fuckin' idiot!