🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 22:38:25 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:

>On 2007-07-07 17:35:01 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>
>> On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 13:03:38 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2007-07-07 07:37:00 -0400, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> said:
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 22:11:24 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2007-07-06 19:08:37 -0400, leroyblue@pillinor.net said:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:52:46 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 2007-07-05 23:57:01 -0400, leroyblue@pillinor.net said:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:01:49 -0400, Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 2007-07-03 22:06:18 -0400, leroyblue@pillinor.net said:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> HAIL TO THE CHIEF!
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Commuting the sentence a convicted felon just because he's a good ole boy is
>>>>>>>>>>> surely giving aid and comfort to our enemies as it shows a lack of ethics and
>>>>>>>>>>> morality and well as a blatant disregard for the law.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> No it doesn't. It show that he's in charge and you yard boys can't do
>>>>>>>>>> anything about it.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Large and in charge like your heros...Stalin, Lenin and Mao.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> No, that would be your posse, I go with Nixon, Reagan and Bush.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Really? You admitted to having a gay affair with a staffer from the 
>>>>>>> Bellevue Psych Ward,
>>>>>>> remember?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No, that was your fantasy when you were a patient their, remember?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> OF COURSE I REMEMBER! I COPIED YOUR CONFESSION!
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>On
>2007-07-03
>
>19:27:47 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -0400, leroyblue@pillinor.net said:
>>>>> 
>>>>> LEROY: My friend from Bellevue said you would come up with something like you
>>>>> have responded with. Damn, those guys are good.
>>>>> 
>>>>> SLIM: You visited your aids-riddled butt-buddy in the psycho ward again?
>>>>> 
>>>>> LEROY: No, FOOL! He's on the staff -- you know the guys in the white coat who
>>>>> come to take you away (again) when your neighbors complain.
>>>>> 
>>>>> SLIM: Since you just admitted to having an Aids-riddled butt-buddy who works
>>>>> in a psycho ward, tell us...how long have  you been an item?
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!
>
>
>Folks,
>
>this 
>>>>> 
>>>> is a GREAT example of the typical  liberal comprehension
>>>> skills.
>>>> slim has NO CLUE just how stupid his mis-interpretation of what was
>>>> posted appears. In slim's demented brain, he actually "thinks" he
>>>> posted proof of some sort of a homo affair.
>>> 
>>> Funny thing, Leroy never denied the allegation because its TRUE.
>> 
>> 
>> Yes, folks... In liberal-speak, ignoring a preposterous statement is
>> the same thing as admitting the preposterous statement is true.
>
>How do you know that the statement made by Leroy was "preposterous"?
>
>And should Leroy not have culpability for making such a statement?
>
>If Leroy's statement is not true, is he not then a LIAR?

Because Leroy never made the preposterous statement. 
You are the fuckin idiot that made the preposterous statement.

Geez... You'd think slim could remember what he did, day to day...

Mike Smith