🚀 go-pugleaf

Why are liberals so opposed to allowing people to earn a living wage and then
spend it as they choose?
Why do liberals all hate Western Civilization so rabidly?  Do you not see what
the alternatives are?  Look at the world around you.  Now take away the internal
combustion engine, as your presidential candidate has stated, its one on the
greatest evils of this century.  What is left?  Nuclear power?  I think not.
So, without any foresight of the immediate results, why don't you just stop
using any of the benefits from the things you hate so much.
Do without clean city water, that uses deadly chemicals and those are EVIL.
Don't use the sewage facilities, they are run on electricity mostly generated by
burning Hydro-Carbons and they are EVIL.  Don't use any form of transport that
is electrical or combustion, they are EVIL.  Don't wear those non-organicly
grown clothes, they to are EVIL.  Those left-wing newspapers, they are printed
on paper, that too is EVIL.  So sit in the dark, festering in your own filth,
and then begin to lecture others on the appropriateness of their actions. While
you are using the things that you claim to be responsible for the downfall of
the world, it is hypocritical at best.  If you have a constructive alternative,
offer it.
    But when offering it, be prepared to have your ideas undergo a vigorous
challenge.  That is what moves science forward.  Baseless claims, or claims made
from summaries of reports that differ so greatly from the reports as to be
disinformation, receive approval only from like minded sources in the media.
And you wonder why conservatives are suspicious of your intentions???
Surely that is just another ploy, no one could really be that naive.

John

Tiny Human Ferret wrote:

> Professor Vonroach wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 12:05:41 +0000, Mike <moon12@erols.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Why is that "Conservatives" are so rabidly opposed to conservation,
> > >clean air and clean water?
> > >
> > >--
> > >Mike
>
> > Probably in the minds of left wing extremists because of lies and
> > propaganda such as you post above.
>
> I don't think so. Last time the traceylevin thingy was around, he was last
> sighted blathering on and on about how the catchbasins that impound
> stormwaters coming off of hot parking lots -- thus preventing overheated
> waters from destroying the ecologies of small streams -- were a LeftyLiberal
> plot to spend our tax dollars, and were orchestrated by Feminazi Wiccan
> TreeHuggers(tm) as a plot to destroy Male Christianity.
>
> It's the traceylevin thingy that keeps spreading the propaganda, you know.
> What with its profound religious intolerance, and general lack of how things
> work, it's doing a much better job of convincing people to vote Democrat
> than any Democrats could.
>
> It was finally driven offline, and probably into a fit of quivering
> neurosis, when it was pointed out that spending tax money on catchbasins to
> cool down parking-lot runoff was profoundly conservative, in all ways.
> Since, after all, one of the major backbones of American Manliness is a day
> out at the stream fly-fishing, maintaining cool and constant small-stream
> temperatures promotes the health of the stream, the health of the trout, and
> the perpetuation of a very Manly American Way of Life.
>
> Thus, a vote for Tracey Levin is a vote against _trout_.
>
> So, let's hear it professor von roach.
>
> Are you, and Conservative Republicans, for or against Trout, and the
> perpetuation of American Manliness, aided and abetted by slightly higher
> local and state taxes, ensuring that catchbasins are mandated to prevent our
> streams from overheating?
>
> The enlightened voters want to know.
>
> I'll be damned if I ever vote for someone who's opposed to trout.
>
> --
>                     "We look through a glass but darkly:
>                  What we see is more colored by our beliefs,
>                than what we believe is colored by what we see."