🚀 go-pugleaf

Chris Bellomy <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote in news:0T37853oIobtN34
@redshark.goodshow.net:

> Paul Slocum <weoriuoiu@swiuye.weu> wrote:
>: > Wikipedia
>: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Foolery_Hendrix
>: 
>: I'm not sure why, but I've tried to save your article from deletion.  
>: Probably will still get deleted though.  You know you aren't supposed 
>: to write your own articles, right?
>: 
>: http://en.wikitrumpery.org/wiki/WP:AUTO
> 
> Sweet merciful crap, he wrote his own Wikipedia page?

Many such egoist pages have been written and placed there under "pen
names", or even by paid stooges, "masterminded" by those who imagine
themselves to be somehow "important" to the world, most having serious
mental problems that actually stem from intense feelings of inferiority,
since the feckless well know the reality of their own limitations.

So, rather than do something of value to society, such as volunteer to
work at their local food bank, or assist at an elderly centre, they choose
to spend their time deviously, attempting self-aggrandisement, using
whatever means that they can manage to promote themselves.

Some pages on Wikipedia are even *protected* by paid agitprops, who work
either for individuals, or dogmatic (often tax emempt) organisations, all
changes, or additions to these pages being disallowed by the dictatorial
propagandist in charge, no matter how irrefutably correct, or well proven
the change, or addition may be.  These are apparently paid for and
allowed by the Wikipedia website, examples of this being such "sensitive"
subjects as homosexuality, Jewish "interests", negroid "history", various
types of religion, [sham] philosophy, leftist "thought" and others.
Funding for locked control of these pages derives primarily from left wing
"progressive" types, who claim to be "tolerant", yet allow no dissent.

Some who do not care to have such a page about them created must work hard
to have -theirs-, which they did not autohrise, removed. ;-)