🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:37:41 -0600, SteveR <tex_driver@comcast.net>
wrote:

>In article <4dum22tvtf8639r0pfp0o97kfkusp2esdm@4ax.com>,
> / control / <control @remote.nul> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:55:12 -0600, SteveR <tex_driver@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> >In article 
>> ><jackzwick-AF2594.16432222032006@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>,
>> > Jack Zwick <jackzwick@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <ydWdnbkD1s5lXLzZRVn-uA@forethought.net>,
>> >>  Anonymous <anon@anonymous.com> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > "arminius" <richard norton@cybertrails.com>  wrote :
>> >> > 
>> >> > > Republicans must distance themselves from this worthless and
>> >> > > failed President.
>> >> > > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > Who Clinton?
>> >> > 
>> >> > Yeah we know he failed but it's over now.
>> >> 
>> >> Better get ready. January 20, 2009
>> >> 
>> >> President Hillary Clinton
>> >
>> >From what I see, the repub's are more eager to see her run for pres than 
>> >most dem's. I wonder why?
>> 
>> That way they can blame the blacks for losing the presidency.
>
>I think it has more to do with her overall approval rating than it does 
>with any racial issue.
>
>Her supporters are quite generous, though. Much more generous than they 
>are to the Democrat party as a whole - they seem to have a fund-raising 
>problem under Dean.
>
>So, she might get the nomination by default, 'cause she's the only one 
>that can afford to run.
>
> 
>> Bush's wife Uncle Condi will get the shit beat out of her in an
>> election.
>
>If the R's decide to put her on the ticket, it would be as VP, not the 
>top slot, in order to groom her to be the first woman president. She 
>consistently polls in the top three among polled Repub voters, so 
>perhaps the inherent racialism of the left ("Uncle Condi") would rally 
>the liberal base to actually vote.
>
>> Like they say, I can't tell you who the first Black
>> president will be, but I can tell you who the next president will be
>> the day after.
>
>So, you're saying that the US is inherently too racist a society to 
>tolerate a black president. I think perhaps you're projecting.
>
>A black Democrat would be less likely to be assissinated than a black 
>Republican, and should the latter suffer that fate, it would likely be 
>at the hands of a Democrat, most likely black. There's a lot of inherent 
>anger in both those groups.
>
>
>I know that assassination is a popular theme nowadays on the left, which 
>is not unusual if you look at those who have assassinated or attempted 
>to do so in the past - they share a certain mental instability, racism 
>and/or leftism.
>
>And if you read Kos, Atrios, Democrat Underground et. al., you'll get a 
>certain sense of desperation, anger, self-pity, rage, self-doubt and 
>helplessness, all wrapped up in conspiracy theories galore, and the 
>aforementioned tendency to entertain fantasies of assassination.

Better tell that Great Republican Xtian Pat Robertson to lay off all
that naughty kind of talk because it makes the administration nervous.

Americans deserve to be governed by whatever they are foolish enough
to be herded into electing.  After all, they don't teach the British
version of the Revolution in the US public schools.

Don't be crushed just because the Bush Administration is impotent and
produced no heir.  There will never be a Black president; the whole
debate is purely academic.  Face it, with great Black "leaders" like
Jackson, Farrakhan and Sharpton to skew the agenda, The West Wing
scenario is much more likely: a Hispanic President.  Since Hispanics
are streaming across the borders unchecked AND out breeding Whites and
the slave boats have long since stopped pulling up to the East Coast,

Hispanics will always outnumber Blacks --- and they organize.  Their
mantra is "opportunity" as opposed to the Black mantra of
"entitlement."  This flag waving demonstration is just the tip of the
iceberg.  I'll go so far as to say we will have a Hispanic president
followed by an Asian President before we ever have a Black president.

As far as your conspiracy scenarios, a White President who has a VP in
any other group won't sleep well for the entire four years because
there are too many Farrakhans itchy.