🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <f7dgid$l2g$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
 Joeseph P. Blow <jpblow@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:40:25 -0500, Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom>
> wrote:
> 
> >In article <f7dcsl$b12$5@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> > Joeseph P. Blow <jpblow@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:59:22 -0500, Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom>
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >In article <4699a285$0$20582$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
> >> > Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 2007-07-14 22:06:33 -0400, Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom> said:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > In article <46997cfd$0$4716$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
> >> >> >  Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> On 2007-07-14 18:41:08 -0400, Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom> 
> >> >> >> said:
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >>> In article <f7bbcj$25e$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> >> >> >>> Joeseph P. Blow <jpblow@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:05:24 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
> >> >> >>>> 
> >> >> >>>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:45:16 -0400, Joeseph P. Blow 
> >> >> >>>>> <jpblow@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:00:03 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:30:19 -0400, Joeseph P. Blow 
> >> >> >>>>>>> <jpblow@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:48:32 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> 
> >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >> >> >>>>>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>>>> aka fellow neocon dupes who haven't yet admitted it to 
> >> >> >>>>>>>> themselves 
> >> >> >>>>>>>> that
> >> >> >>>>>>>> they were wrong
> >> >> >>>>>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> this is typical liberal-think. This poor ignorant buffoon
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> actually thinks we are still trying to "take" Iraq and 
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Afghanistan. 
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> We
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> already did that.. in about 3 weeks.
> >> >> >>>>>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>>>> No, we didn't.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The Taliban and Saddam were defeated in record time.
> >> >> >>>>>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>>>> The taliban wasn't IN iraq until after saddam was ousted, 
> >> >> >>>>>>>> dipshit.
> >> >> >>>>>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>>>> See what I mean, folks. Dumber than dirt...
> >> >> >>>>>> Yes, you are.  You're the one that made the claim.   Backing 
> >> >> >>>>>> down 
> >> >> >>>>>> now?
> >> >> >>>>>> The taliban haven't been defeated. Bin Ladin hasn't been caught. 
> >> >> >>>>>>  
> >> >> >>>>>> US
> >> >> >>>>>> Servicemen and Iraqi citizens are dying.  You are a fool.
> >> >> >>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>> Heh heh heh ..
> >> >> >>>>> 
> >> >> >>>>> You're the moron that "forgot" the Taliban were in Afghanistan
> >> >> >>>> 
> >> >> >>>> Still are.  Still haven't been defeated.  Nice try, neocon dupe.  
> >> >> >>>> You
> >> >> >>>> lose again.
> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >>> They never will be defeated. Islam is simply a superior culture, 
> >> >> >>> and 
> >> >> >>> there is nothing you or I can do to stand in their way.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> BULLSHIT.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> Organized Religion is the Opiate of the masses.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Citation of marxist principles does wonders for your argument(s).
> >> >> 
> >> >> It certainly does, when its the truth.
> >> >> 
> >> >> More people have killed/be killed beacuse of religion than any other 
> >> >> reason.
> >> >
> >> >That's simplistic rhetoric.
> >> 
> >> Yet it's as true today as it was at any other time in history.
> >
> >Sorry, no. Communism alone killed more people in the 20th century than 
> >all religiously-motivated efforts combined.
> 
> Most killed were because of their religion.

Incorrect. Most were killed because they were dangers to the state, or 
perished through the dysfunctional nature of communist governance.


> >> And now it's christians killing muslims.
> >
> >You are simply parroting jihadi propaganda.
> 
> Are you actually DENYING that the US is killing muslims?

No, but as surprising as it may be, there are Muslims who believe and 
act differently than the ones we are targeting. They are not all the 
same.


> >It is in fact Muslims who kill the most Muslims. Non-Muslim nations such 
> >as the US have expended the most to protect Muslims from other Muslims.
> 
> Oh, bullshit.  Fucking neocon dupe.

Actually, it is true. Profane declarations are a poor substitute for 
research.
 
> >> Actually, it could be.  If there were NO religions, there'd be no
> >> religion to attack or defend.
> >
> >Excellent logic for the pre-teen set, but as stated, no matter the 
> >warring factions, land and resources are the most common motivations.
> 
> Your argument is invalid and isn't working.  You should try something
> else. You know, something with truth to it.

Actually, the argument is correct.

 
> >> >> Pat Robertson is a Mullah.
> >> >
> >> >In a comparative sense, he occupies a position comparable to a Muslim 
> >> >Mullah -  but not all Mullahs preach holy war, nor do most Christian 
> >> >preachers.
> >> 
> >> Nor are all muslims terrorists.
> >
> >Your tenuous grasp of historical reality has led you to a painted 
> >corner, Joseph.
> 
> So you're claiming all muslims are terrorists?   Fool.  Oh, and it's
> Joeseph, not Joseph.  Sorry you can't read.

The portion you snipped explained it. There's no need to bother with 
your edit as argument ploy - the mark of an average mind.