Article View: dfw.generl
Article #1Re: The real 2nd Amendment
From: sadie
Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 00:00
33 lines
2628 bytes
2628 bytes
Lawrence Kennon wrote: > > Albert Isham wrote: > > > > >...You must ahve missed Dennis Henigan's article, "Arms, Anarchy > > and the Second Amendment" in the Valparaiso University Law Review, Fall > > 1991. > > > > Here's a portion of that article; > > > > V. THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE INSURRECTIONIST THEORY > > > > As noted, Levinson suggests the possibility that the Second Amendment may > > guarantee a right "to keep arms that could be taken up against tyranny > > wherever found . . . " Since Levinson is making assertions about > > constitutional rights which presumably are to be enforced by courts,... > > It is right at this point that the author of the above law review goes > astray. If it comes to this point, the point of citizens taking up arms > against government, then it ain't going to be "enforced by courts...". > It is going to be enforced by arms. Period. If the rebels win then > _they_ will appoint the courts. IF the government wins then you know > damn well they will hang ever who they can get their hands on. > > This is an extremely silly law review article. Idiots thinking that > the courts are going to be setting around deciding whether the > revolt is legitimate or not? Jeez. > > lk Why are continuing this?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<337801C2.26C7@erols.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3357AAF5.2CF4@flash.net> <336565AB.317B@tao.sosc.osshe.edu> <5k4ioh$3du$2@nw001.infi.net> <3367088f.53268626@news.primenet.com> <5k7egi$j0f@piglet.cc.utexas.edu> <5k7qkt$iuc$1@nw003.infi.net> <3368AE3A.6B8F@bmc.DELETE.com> <336944FB.2948@tao.sosc.osshe.edu> <5kcga4$b1p$10@nw003.infi.net> <336C2F0A.2941@tab.com> <3373857A.575@echonet.com> <5l5262$adi$2@sun1.sure.net> <5l6pet$7e7$1@nw001.infi.net> <3377920C.118A@tandem.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,fea4d6eb084a6e77 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: 10675b,fea4d6eb084a6e77 X-Google-Attributes: gid10675b,public X-Google-Thread: 10dabe,209fc102a164220c X-Google-Attributes: gid10dabe,public X-Google-Thread: 1061a7,fea4d6eb084a6e77 X-Google-Attributes: gid1061a7,public X-Google-Thread: f61d6,fea4d6eb084a6e77 X-Google-Attributes: gidf61d6,public X-Google-Thread: fec2a,fea4d6eb084a6e77 X-Google-Attributes: gidfec2a,public X-Google-Thread: 1566df,21b492721e6a067d,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1566df,public From: sadie@erols.net Subject: Re: The real 2nd Amendment Date: 1997/05/13 Message-ID: <337801C2.26C7@erols.net> X-Deja-AN: 241229284 References: <3357AAF5.2CF4@flash.net> <336565AB.317B@tao.sosc.osshe.edu> <5k4ioh$3du$2@nw001.infi.net> <3367088f.53268626@news.primenet.com> <5k7egi$j0f@piglet.cc.utexas.edu> <5k7qkt$iuc$1@nw003.infi.net> <3368AE3A.6B8F@bmc.DELETE.com> <336944FB.2948@tao.sosc.osshe.edu> <5kcga4$b1p$10@nw003.infi.net> <336C2F0A.2941@tab.com> <3373857A.575@echonet.com> <5l5262$adi$2@sun1.sure.net> <5l6pet$7e7$1@nw001.infi.net> <3377920C.118A@tandem.com> Organization: . Newsgroups: dfw.generl,ca.general,nyc.general,chicago.general,alt.revisionism,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.usa.constitution