Article View: dfw.singles
Article #104Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL
From: Etherman
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 1997 00:00
28 lines
2741 bytes
2741 bytes
Bigus <bigus@ix.netcom.com> wrote in article <MPG.d3ca2866d86212098977f@nntp.ix.netcom.com>... > Every detail of your makeup can be considered either attractive, neutral > or unnatractive (to any given person). Being tall and very skinny is > probably not especialy attractive but probably not unattractive either. > Few things all alone override everything else. > > The point is, dont look at yourself and give up as soon as you find > something that is not the way you would have it. You have many other > things to work with, and probably some of them could use some work, so > learn to use them. > > John I think it comes down to a matter of extremes. Being too tall is going to be considered unattractive by your average woman. Same with being too thin or too short. Being in some extreme category is going to make things difficult, but probably not hopeless. For the guy who is too skinny you should try working out. I personally tried but didn't have much success. Maybe you'll have better luck. -- Etherman
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01bbfddc$4439ed20$13f042ce@etherman.mdc.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net> <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net> <32CC01DF.6E1A@exu.ericsson.se> <5aknh1$eau@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> <32D09C5F.1182@verdenet.com> <MPG.d3ca2866d86212098977f@nntp.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f731,5baab29f1c13eb92 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f731,public X-Google-Thread: f43e0,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e0,public X-Google-Thread: f4c9a,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c9a,public X-Google-Thread: 10a5b2,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a5b2,public X-Google-Thread: f4f15,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f15,public X-Google-Thread: f8a21,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a21,public X-Google-Thread: f9306,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9306,public X-Google-Thread: 1095c1,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid1095c1,public From: "Etherman" <etherman@mdc.net> Subject: Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL Date: 1997/01/09 Message-ID: <01bbfddc$4439ed20$13f042ce@etherman.mdc.net> X-Deja-AN: 208589399 references: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net> <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net> <32CC01DF.6E1A@exu.ericsson.se> <5aknh1$eau@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com> <32D09C5F.1182@verdenet.com> <MPG.d3ca2866d86212098977f@nntp.ix.netcom.com> organization: Illumanati newsgroups: dfw.singles,dfw.personals,de.talk.romance,dc.romance,houston.singles,houston.personals,fj.soc.men-women,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.romance.mature-adult,alt.romance.online,alt.personals,ba.singles,alt.romance.unhappy,alt.soulmates,ba.personals,chi.pe