🚀 go-pugleaf

In article 
<6e79dfef-ec88-434e-b7d3-163eabb1c024@41g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
 bushlyed <bushlyed@yahoo.com> wrote:

> 
> Because of the motivation of the your illustrious hero.  His invasion
> of Iraq had nothing, nada, zilch, zero about human rights.  It was
> about oil, oil, oil, oil, OIL and about revenge against Saddam.


Oddly enough, we haven't taken their oil, and they're forming a 
rerpresentative government.

How do those facts fit with your "oil, oil, oil" theory?

 
> But all they have to do to you people is wave a boogeyman like Saddam
> to get you war mongers to salivate.

But the "bogeyman" is is not real, Saddam was.

At least, that's what the dem's we're telling us for years before and after 
Bush was elected.

Surely you remember the many times we were warned of the "imminent threat"?

(Maybe, just maybe, that's why they voted in the majority to give Bush the 
power to take out the "boogeyman").


> Now, there is genocide around the world, why are you guys not
> clamoring for us to do something.

We do when it is our *national interest*, just like everyone else.

If there is no strategic value to a region, we let the UN handle things, 
isn't that what they're for?