🚀 go-pugleaf

On Nov 26, 12:09 am, "Chris" <vscooternos...@att.net> wrote:

 *As long as people like that are free, we are all in imminent
danger....


He is certainly not free are that is an asinine argument; he is in
prison


>
> You obviously don't understand the definitioin of imminent
>
> *Sure I do....and I think anytime someone like this is out on the street
> there is an imminent danger of him killing someone. Just because he can't
> always do it doesn't mean he isn't trying to....
>

Definition:  likely to occur at any moment; impending: Her death is
imminent.

And again, life imprisonment is slightly different than being out in
the street but I guess you are not bright enough to understand that
>
> *I personally don't think of it as an advance myself. Getting rid of the
> scum of the earth is not a bad thing.


And what if I decided you were the scum of the earth which I am
quickly drawing to that conclusion

Hitler decided that the Jews were the scum of the earth

The KKK and southern bigots decided that blacks were the scum of the
earth

>Do you think if we ever catch OBL we
> should just sentence him to life in prison?

Which would be a whole hell of a lot humiliating for him and his cause
than just killing him; killing him would make him a martyr

Don't get me wrong, if we could take him out with a missle strike, I
am all in favor but I just would love to subject him to the type of
humilation that a 6'5" muslim extemist would have to endure among
black and hispanic gangs in prison


>
> * I doubt very much that that is the reason.....I still believe the greatest
> reason for our crime problem is our backward ass drug policy.
>

I hate our drug policy too.  But this guy did not kill because of our
drug policy


> Right and what happens when you do it fast and get it wrong and
> execute an innocent person
>
> *Like I said, we can do it faster and without a loss of justice.

The two are mutually exclusive

> With the
> technology available today the chances of a wrongful conviction have dropped
> dramatically.

Check out the innocence project please

> And most of the appeals are not because they aren't guilty,
> they are because some lawyer says they weren't convicted the right way or on
> of the endless conflicting details of todays laws wasn't followed properly
> so the scumbag deserves a new trial...please.....
>

Right way of conviction.  Like beating a confession out of a person,
or fabricating evidence

> How do you correct that, how do you make that up
>
> *As you well know, it can't be made up.....but I would rather kill a
> thousand bad ones and possibly a couple of good ones

What if your mother was one of the good ones; jezus, what horrible
reasoning

>, then let the thousand
> bad ones live just in case one of them might be innocent. And before you
> ask, if I was the innocent one then yes I would rather die then let the
> thousand bad ones go free. At least it would be a noble death.
>

Really.  I will gladly buy your ticket to the death row of your choice

That is an extemely idiotic statement

>
> Next life?  Give me a break
>
> *Who knows if there is a next one or not.....maybe there electrical energy
> signature will just mix back into the universe and the next time it becomes
> human life it will be better.......use the force Luke.....
>

What are you smoking.  I really would like to get some of that

>
> *Again, I disagree.....some people just deserve killing.....and that makes
> life better for the rest of us

Yeah, and who gets to decide who deserves killing and what qualifies
them for that