🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:43:30 -0500, Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom>
wrote:

>In article <qdmoe35jv3thrvi74rgsbf27urvlcjon26@4ax.com>,
> Al Giazirra <thatsme@realitalianlastname.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:11:07 -0500, Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> >In article <l01le39bppcgc9kjut27fhok7irht6ukfp@4ax.com>,
>> > Al Giazirra <thatsme@realitalianlastname.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Let's just get the hell out and allow all the animals to kill
>> >> themselves.  If we don't like the outcome, nuke 'em all and start with
>> >> a clean slate.  Why is this so hard to see?  Is it that some friends
>> >> won't make a railcar load of money?
>> >> 
>> >
>> >As long as you don't mind Iran, Russia and China controlling the global 
>> >economy, and $6/gal gas, that's not a bad idea.
>> 
>> Well okay, if it'll save me a few bucks, then I'll concur that we need
>> to shed more of our youngsters' blood and keep spending billions
>> fighting animals who have been killing each other without recourse
>> since before Christ first swung a hammer.  
>
>But these are nuclear, not Biblical times, and it's a global economy 
>very sensitive to energy concerns, which is one reason we are in Iraq. 
>There are others.

Sure, wouldn't it be grand if everything would go our way?  Count how
many years it's been since we first arrived there.  Nuculer (as the
current president says) or biblical, the fact remains that the only
way to control those human beings is exactly as Saddam did.  When they
even consider stepping out of line, they need to disappear.  Only a
fool would actually think they are reasonable, and only fools continue
to support this Vietnam of the 21st Century.