🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: dfw.singles
Article #122

Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL

#122
From: Adrienne
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1997 00:00
24 lines
2190 bytes
In <32CC01DF.6E1A@exu.ericsson.se> *sunbird* <exuptr@exu.ericsson.se>
writes: 
>
>scott bence wrote:
>
>> [No flames, just wondering]
>> What would be meant by "too tall"? Ladies? Anybody, Your thoughts?
>
>18 feet.  much too tall.
>
>Ed jones also.
>
>
>-- 
>sunbird
>sunbird@cyberramp.net

I have never dated a guy too tall for me.  I agree with the 4-5 inches
taller comment as I have found that guys 6'4" to 6'6" are a nice size. 
I have learned that height doesn't have any impact on the basic decency
of an individual and isn't that the bottom line?

Adrienne
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5aknh1$eau@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net> <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net> <32CC01DF.6E1A@exu.ericsson.se>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f43e0,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e0,public
X-Google-Thread: f8a21,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a21,public
X-Google-Thread: f4f15,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f15,public
X-Google-Thread: f4c9a,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c9a,public
X-Google-Thread: f9306,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9306,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a5b2,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a5b2,public
X-Google-Thread: 1095c1,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gid1095c1,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f731,5baab29f1c13eb92
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f731,public
From: drienski@ix.netcom.com(Adrienne)
Subject: Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL
Date: 1997/01/04
Message-ID: <5aknh1$eau@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>
X-Deja-AN: 207609903
references: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net> <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net> <32CC01DF.6E1A@exu.ericsson.se>
organization: Netcom
x-netcom-date: Fri Jan 03 10:49:37 PM CST 1997
newsgroups: dfw.singles,dfw.personals,de.talk.romance,dc.romance,houston.singles,houston.personals,fj.soc.men-women,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.romance.mature-adult,alt.romance.online,alt.personals,ba.singles,alt.romance.unhappy,alt.soulmates,ba.personals,chi.pe