🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: dfw.singles
Article #125

Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL

#125
From: Mark A. Anderson
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 1997 00:00
36 lines
2820 bytes
Adrienne wrote:
> 
> In <32CC01DF.6E1A@exu.ericsson.se> *sunbird* <exuptr@exu.ericsson.se>
> writes:
> >
> >scott bence wrote:
> >
> >> [No flames, just wondering]
> >> What would be meant by "too tall"? Ladies? Anybody, Your thoughts?
> >
> >18 feet.  much too tall.
> >
> >Ed jones also.
> >
> >
> >--
> >sunbird
> >sunbird@cyberramp.net
> 
> I have never dated a guy too tall for me.  I agree with the 4-5 inches
> taller comment as I have found that guys 6'4" to 6'6" are a nice size.
> I have learned that height doesn't have any impact on the basic decency
> of an individual and isn't that the bottom line?
> 
> Adrienne

Howdy all -

So how about a combination of being tall (oh - let's just say 6'5" as an
example - no one I know, of course) AND slender (like 150 lbs or so,
again, just a figure out of the air, you know)? My experience (Uh - I
meant "A guy I know's experience") has not been good because gals don't
seem to want to give me (er - him) much of a chance because I (oops - I
mean "a person") am not a muscle-bound stallion. How do you get someone
to give you a chance?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <32D09C5F.1182@verdenet.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net> <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net> <32CC01DF.6E1A@exu.ericsson.se> <5aknh1$eau@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10f731,5baab29f1c13eb92
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f731,public
X-Google-Thread: f4c9a,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c9a,public
X-Google-Thread: 1095c1,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gid1095c1,public
X-Google-Thread: f4f15,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f15,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e0,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e0,public
X-Google-Thread: f8a21,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a21,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a5b2,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a5b2,public
X-Google-Thread: f9306,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9306,public
From: "Mark A. Anderson" <gonzo@verdenet.com>
Subject: Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL
Date: 1997/01/05
Message-ID: <32D09C5F.1182@verdenet.com>
X-Deja-AN: 208014819
references: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net> <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net> <32CC01DF.6E1A@exu.ericsson.se> <5aknh1$eau@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: verdenet.com
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: dfw.singles,dfw.personals,de.talk.romance,dc.romance,houston.singles,houston.personals,fj.soc.men-women,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.romance.mature-adult,alt.romance.online,alt.personals,ba.singles,alt.romance.unhappy,alt.soulmates,ba.personals,chi.pe
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)