Article View: dfw.singles
Article #129Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL
From: Michael Burt
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 1997 00:00
41 lines
2936 bytes
2936 bytes
In article <01bbf862$a3ba4e40$3ef042ce@etherman.mdc.net>, "Etherman" <etherman@mdc.net> wrote: > scott bence <sbence@fastlane.net> wrote in article > <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net>... > > > 85 percent of the couples have a height difference of 4 to 5 inches. > Which > > > means that women are looking for guys who are above average in height > > > (but not too tall). > > > Etherman > > > > [No flames, just wondering] > > What would be meant by "too tall"? Ladies? Anybody, Your thoughts? > > I guess too tall is anyone over 2 standard deviations from the average. > > > We can change certain aspects of ourselves, height would not be one of > > them. Myself, would not care how tall the lady is. I would assume > > *serious* ladies would feel the same about the guy, You dont really > > notice physical things about the other person *after* a relationship is > > underway. > > > > scot bence > > P.S. New to the group. If you find fascinated by taller women, you would have fun reading the Tall Hawk Report homepage. Michael > > A short time ago I realized that every woman I've asked out, with just > one exception, has been taller than me. I don't know why, but I'm > attracted to tall, thin women with small breasts. > > > -- > Etherman >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<mikeburt-0601972107380001@pon-mi2-07.ix.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net> <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net> <01bbf862$a3ba4e40$3ef042ce@etherman.mdc.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f731,5baab29f1c13eb92 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f731,public X-Google-Thread: 10a5b2,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a5b2,public X-Google-Thread: f8a21,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a21,public X-Google-Thread: f9306,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9306,public X-Google-Thread: f4f15,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f15,public X-Google-Thread: f4c9a,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c9a,public X-Google-Thread: 1095c1,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid1095c1,public X-Google-Thread: f43e0,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e0,public From: mikeburt@ix.netcom.com (Michael Burt) Subject: Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL Date: 1997/01/06 Message-ID: <mikeburt-0601972107380001@pon-mi2-07.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 208244679 references: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net> <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net> <01bbf862$a3ba4e40$3ef042ce@etherman.mdc.net> organization: Netcom x-netcom-date: Mon Jan 06 6:08:45 PM PST 1997 newsgroups: dfw.singles,dfw.personals,de.talk.romance,dc.romance,houston.singles,houston.personals,fj.soc.men-women,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.romance.mature-adult,alt.romance.online,alt.personals,ba.singles,alt.romance.unhappy,alt.soulmates,ba.personals,chi.pe